7 ms·

"Good morning, bitches! Who's ready to do some fuckin' math! Open your books to page 155, let's DO THIS SHIT!" I would prefer my kids not have a teacher that t

by nsxwolf 10y ago

"Good morning, bitches! Who's ready to do some fuckin' math! Open your books to page 155, let's DO THIS SHIT!" I would prefer my kids not have a teacher that talks that way. I think a majority of parents would not appreciate that.

deleted 10y ago
[deleted]
losvedir 10y ago
Ha, the kids would love it, though. I wouldn't be surprised if such a teacher had better educational outcomes.
ajmurmann 10y ago
You answered my question by restating the thing that I'm asking about. Why would you not prefer the far more entertaining version?
matwood 10y ago
If talking this way got more kids interested in actually doing this shit (math), I say go for it.
ghostDancer 10y ago
We are talking here about reading a book, not the teacher's words, i assume that children are not that stupid as to not see it. I guess you are in favor also to cover statues/paintings penises and tits in art books and to rewrite Tintin in Congo and many other books because they are not politically correct.
- nsxwolf 10y ago
  Right, sure. I'm all for covering up Michelangelo's David. Thanks for being so charitable with my words.
  - ghostDancer 10y ago
    I understand you, and people defending it, but i wanted to point that it's a dangerous decision , where do we stop doing it? Who can decide where's the limit between censurable and not?. So Tintin in Congo(they wanted to rewrite it some years ago) it's censurable because it's a comic but Huckleberry Finn not because it's a classic? . And sorry , didn't want to look like was attacking you.
DanBC 10y ago
I agree with you. I don't know why I agree with you. I strongly don't want my child swearing until he's ready to do so. I recognise that this is irrational, and that it's just sounds. Especially because I swear a lot. (Although I feel like this I would support a teacher who chose to use the uncensored version of The Martian in school. )

by nsxwolf 10y ago

deleted 10y ago

[deleted]

losvedir 10y ago

Ha, the kids would love it, though. I wouldn't be surprised if such a teacher had better educational outcomes.

ajmurmann 10y ago

You answered my question by restating the thing that I'm asking about. Why would you not prefer the far more entertaining version?

matwood 10y ago

If talking this way got more kids interested in actually doing this shit (math), I say go for it.

ghostDancer 10y ago

We are talking here about reading a book, not the teacher's words, i assume that children are not that stupid as to not see it. I guess you are in favor also to cover statues/paintings penises and tits in art books and to rewrite Tintin in Congo and many other books because they are not politically correct.

nsxwolf 10y ago
Right, sure. I'm all for covering up Michelangelo's David. Thanks for being so charitable with my words.
- ghostDancer 10y ago
  I understand you, and people defending it, but i wanted to point that it's a dangerous decision , where do we stop doing it? Who can decide where's the limit between censurable and not?. So Tintin in Congo(they wanted to rewrite it some years ago) it's censurable because it's a comic but Huckleberry Finn not because it's a classic? . And sorry , didn't want to look like was attacking you.

DanBC 10y ago

I agree with you. I don't know why I agree with you. I strongly don't want my child swearing until he's ready to do so. I recognise that this is irrational, and that it's just sounds. Especially because I swear a lot. (Although I feel like this I would support a teacher who chose to use the uncensored version of The Martian in school. )