4 ms·
Question related to this topic: If one were to use ASP.NET MVC 2, would one have to use Microsoft's development tools and Microsoft's servers, or are there viab
by cmelbye 16y ago
Question related to this topic: If one were to use ASP.NET MVC 2, would one have to use Microsoft's development tools and Microsoft's servers, or are there viable open source alternatives?
- crnbrdeater 16y agoYou don't have to use their dev tools but I am not sure why you would not want to. You get tons out of the box with Visual Studio Express...and its free. You are also free to use the command line to compile your apps, but again I am not sure why you would want to.
- peteforde 16y agoArguing "and it's free" to a community of open source enthusiasts won't likely change any minds.
- Encosia 16y agoIt's a valid and worthwhile point to make. Outside of the Microsoft development community, it's very common for people to assume you must buy an expensive Microsoft product to develop on the platform (maybe because that was true at one point). Anyone who spends much time talking about Microsoft development outside the MS community develops that preemptive "and it's free" reflex quickly.
- Daishiman 16y agoWithout plugin support Visual Studio is good as dead to me. I have several plugins which I consider essential, and I wouldn't put up with developing with a purposely crippled tool.
- d2viant 16y agoAre you talking specifically about the Express editions? Visual Studio has had plugin support for awhile. Resharper comes to mind immediately, among others.
- billpaetzke 16y agoIt would be an uphill battle to veer from the Microsoft stack and tools, if you're doing an ASP.NET site.