5 ms·
I get what you're saying, but the definition of the term 'prominence' doesn't help you, because by definition, Mount Everest's 'prominence' equals its actual he
by niftich 10y ago
I get what you're saying, but the definition of the term 'prominence' doesn't help you, because by definition, Mount Everest's 'prominence' equals its actual height above MSL. This special case is necessary to give the recursive definition of 'prominence' a base case.
However, it's true that Mount Everest's "relief above local terrain" is not equal to its actual altitude above MSL, but this is just informal empirical footballing and no rigorous technical definitions exist.
- leeoniya 10y agoyou're right, i mis-used "prominence" and meant "relief above local terrain"
- pg_is_a_butt 10y agoyou're all wrong. flipping a mountain upside-down isn't a thing. you're all idiots.
- jagger27 10y agoIf only the Earth were a perfectly featureless sphere how simple things would be.
- quakeguy 10y agoBut it nearly is one!
- atmosx 10y ago> If only the Earth were a perfectly featureless sphere how simple things would be. <rant> Blah, boring. I remember a girl describing how nice everything would be if everything was symmetrical and deterministic, from language, to language, to numbers, to nature, to math... In the end she went on describing heaven as such a place... Man, for the first time in my life I thought that if heaven is like this, I'd like never go there :-) When Homer described Helen, he wrote "The most beautiful woman in the world", he left the details to the reader. Now imagine if he had added the slightest hint of determinism... </rant>
- sandworm101 10y agoClimbers have a definition: how far is it from base camp to the top? In other words, the mountain starts where "walking" becomes something more difficult than a gravel path. Another version of this is distance between the parking lot and the top, at what point are wheeled vehicles no longer an option?