5 ms·
Well, you can run it and it does things, which effectively puts the question of "real" or "satire" into our hands. At this point, it is what we make of it.
by callahad 10y ago
Well, you can run it and it does things, which effectively puts the question of "real" or "satire" into our hands. At this point, it is what we make of it.
- deleted 10y ago[deleted]
- 5ilv3r 10y agoThat was gloriously poetic.
- Dylan16807 10y agoYou can use an onion article as a force to motivate activism, unleashing a very real effect upon the world. But it remains satire. Your post is more about real vs. not real, while I think the question was supposed to be satire vs. not satire.
- ncallaway 10y agoThe parent post from jff was explicitly framed as "real vs satire" and not as "satire vs not satire".
- Dylan16807 10y agoIt used the word "real", but I'm pretty sure it was a synonym for "not satire", not the more philosophical meaning that callahad took. It's very common to use the word "real" that way, for something that isn't just extant to demonstrate an idea.