3 ms·
I don't understand your question. Edit: I see that you've edited your post. _delirium's post had two things in it that are incorrect. It was highly rated, so
by asdflkj 16y ago
I don't understand your question.
Edit: I see that you've edited your post.
_delirium's post had two things in it that are incorrect. It was highly rated, so many other people are presumably wrong in the same way. I pointed out why they're wrong.
On most other topics, it wouldn't occur to anyone to object to my pointing out why some things are wrong, just because it wasn't apropo [sic] the origin of the thread. This is why I don't talk about this and a few other topics publicly unless I'm anonymous, and mostly even then. People just tell me to shut up, in so many words (and that's if I'm lucky).
- joe_the_user 16y agoThe two main point's of Delirium earlier post were: * Critiques of financial speculation go back to times before modern antisemitism. * Modern quantitative critiques of speculation aren't connected modern antisemitism. When I described your points as "Apropo of nothing" I meant related neither to the thread's topic nor Delirium's post. You should be able to read above why.