4 ms·
Does literally every non-political website needs to talk about Trump? I go to SO for answers, not stands.
by starik36 10y ago
Does literally every non-political website needs to talk about Trump? I go to SO for answers, not stands.
- zappo2938 10y agoDon't forget to thank the nice, kind people from the banned countries who helped you do your work, make money, and contribute to the overall economy so you can take care of your family.
- my_ghola 10y agoYes, we want to talk about it, but does it need to be in StackOverflow? Is there a StackExchange for politics? Edit: there is http://politics.stackexchange.com/ http://politics.stackexchange.com/
- zzleeper 10y agoCan you really stay out of politics? Ten years from now, what if Spolski is in jail and SO closed down. Then what?
- a3n 10y agoSpolsky's post was specifically about the SO community. It was the best place and the best time to post it. If you disagree, feel free to moderate the post for irrelevance, I know they have a mechanism to do that over there.
- nooron 10y agoAre you any less likely or more likely to support policies based on what you see in digital media? Do the owners of these websites owe it to you to not talk about their opinions? I understand that you may not wish to deal with this. But I suspect many of the people affected by this ban also do not wish to deal with it, and that creating lots of public pressure is the best way to effect change.
- FLGMwt 10y agoMy thought on this is that if CEOs of traditionally non-political platforms are compelled to post political content, there might be something significant/concerning happening. More directly: did you find this browsing SO?
- thomasjoulin 10y agoFirst they came for the Socialists, and I did not speak out— Because I was not a Socialist. Then they came for the Trade Unionists, and I did not speak out— Because I was not a Trade Unionist. Then they came for the Jews, and I did not speak out— Because I was not a Jew. Then they came for me—and there was no one left to speak for me. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/First_they_came_.. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/First_they_came_...
- mixedCase 10y agoIf only more american "liberals" had spoken out against their president waging war in Iraq, Syria and Libya; as fiercely as many of them are speaking out against their new president simply banning those countries' citizens from entering the US... Who knows... I guess we can only now imagine what could've been.
- FLGMwt 10y agoThe action we take now is so we don't have to say "if only"
- adventured 10y agoExcept now it may be too late, which is why when you have a President that is of your own party, you protest their terrible policies so they will (hopefully) listen. Presidents do not tend to listen to the opposition protestors (and that's all the more true when said President's party has the House, Senate, and Supreme Court).
- mixedCase 10y agoThat's one way to downplay the tens of thousands of refugees displaced by the rebels the Obama administration armed, which, by the way, caused both Brexit to win and secured Trump's seat. Good thing the Internet really went to town talking about how the left needs to be more introspective after Trump's win, it seems we all learned from that.
- AckSyn 10y ago
- a3n 10y agoPretty sure you could have guessed what it was going to be about, given what's going on today, and just not clicked on it. "Change the channel" is what we used to say. Or do you click on every SO link?