11 ms·
Track Trump: The First 100 Days
- dforrestwilson1 10y agoHolding government to account is a good thing, thanks Sam. I have to wonder though if we'd see the same level of scrutiny if HRC had won.
- neuromancer2701 10y agoWhat if he actually does what he said he would??
- deleted 10y ago[deleted]
- bradleyankrom 10y agothen we'll see that reflected in the app
- ipunchghosts 10y agoAgreed. thanks for doing this. bookmarked. EDIT. being downvoted. I agreed on the thanks for sam for putting together the list together in an easy-t0-digest format, not the HRC part!
- stephancoral 10y agoConsidering the amount of conspiracy nuts who make it their life goal to pin everything on the Clintons and the amount of mainstream attention they got + the rabid anti-Hillary sentiment on the right, my answer is "absolutely".
- Alex3917 10y agoYou really think there would have been millions of people out protesting? Somehow I doubt it.
- tashoecraft 10y agoI think we wouldn't have seen millions protesting because Trump supporters were overwhelmingly not from cities. Where it is much easier to get hundreds of thousands together.
- stephancoral 10y agoAnd yet, there were hundreds of protests in small cities across the country for the Woman's March. Here's one from Alabama: http://wkrg.com/2017/01/21/womens-march-mobile-draws-hundreds-of-men-and-women/ http://wkrg.com/2017/01/21/womens-march-mobile-draws-hundred...
- knz 10y agoThe Tea Party got a large turnout after Obama was elected - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tea_Party_protests https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tea_Party_protests
- mkohlmyr 10y agoOverwhelmingly not from cities? 62% of the US population lives in cities. Trump got 46% of the popular vote. What you are saying is just barely mathematically possible and most likely untrue.
- stephancoral 10y agoWho said anything about protesting? Either way, yea, I doubt there'd be as big of a protest (there would still be a lot, remember the tea party?) because H was an actual rational candidate who may have had some questionable views but didn't insult war heroes, slander entire ethnicities, and brag about sexual assault? It's pretty obvious why Trump is unpopular and why people are protesting him. I don't really see the point of your comment other than to stir up nothing. Are you really trying to have a discourse about this? Somehow I doubt it.
- Alex3917 10y ago> I don't really see the point of your comment other than to stir up nothing. She was running on a campaign of starting a war with Russia. If you see sending mostly poor folks from cities and the Bible Belt over to die in Syria or wherever as being 'nothing' then I have no problem stirring that up. We certainly shouldn't condone Trump's comments about women. But if you think his comments magically erase, say, the Clinton's role in the HIV epidemic then I think you're drinking the Kool-Aid. So yeah, I protested Trump, and if Clinton had won I'd be protesting her also.
- WayneBro 10y agoRight, "conspiracy nuts". Because there has never been a conspiracy ever anywhere.
- stephancoral 10y agoThe extent to which the Clintons undergo the "conspiracy" treatment is almost comical. There are entire galaxies of blogs and sites dedicated to teasing out symbolism from the most mundane of details. See: pizzagate.
- 234dd57d2c8db 10y agoYup, it's just coincidence that a politician makes 200M via a "charitable" organization. Nothing to see here folks, just keep those donations from Saudi rolling in so they can buy up our water resources and dairy farms. Only a lunatic would believe such as thing!
- WayneBro 10y agoYou mean like when Hillary Clinton repeatedly invoked the existence of a "vast right-wing conspiracy" against her and Bill back in the 90's? Yes, that was comical. Anyway, pizzagate is a well known hoax. Does that somehow cancel out all the other conspiracies that surround the Clintons? Logically it does not but most people are only thinking at a 3rd grade level so it's a great distraction. Where there's smoke, there's fire and there's plenty of evidence to support the Clintons selling nuclear secrets to China, smuggling drugs with the CIA at Mena Airport and of course the infamous "body count".
- dingo_bat 10y ago> pizzagate is a well known hoax Is it? I haven't found any solid debunking of the really weird aspects (handkerchief email). The wikipedia article lists [1] and [2] as citations for the word "debunked", but both don't really offer any compelling argument except the general preposterousness of the crazy 4chan talk. But there are no alternative, plausible explanations for the weird, code-like language of some of the emails. Please point me to better debunkings if you know or can find out. [1] http://www.snopes.com/pizzagate-conspiracy/ http://www.snopes.com/pizzagate-conspiracy/ [2] https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2016/12/10/business/media/pizzagate.html https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2016/12/10/business/medi...
- songshu 10y agoSure there are all the political reasons to wonder. And also, Trump made a lot of specific pledges such as the wall, repealing Obamacare, cutting corporate tax rate. In each case it's easy to say whether it was done or not. So there's more opportunity to do this with him.
- jimcsharp 10y agoI hope this easily digestible politician tracking continues: https://www.trudeaumetre.ca/ https://www.trudeaumetre.ca/
- astrodust 10y agoNice work on them spelling the domain incorrectly. "Meter" is a device used to measure things, or as in musical time. "Metre" is almost exclusively a unit of distance. It's not called a "speedometre" unless you're French.
- akjainaj 10y agoFunny that a part of Canada speaks French. Who would've known, eh?
- astrodust 10y agoObviously, Trudeau himself does. That's why it's important to register both domains. Someone else scooped trudeaumeter.ca. The header on the English site says clearly "Trudeau Meter". If you're going to embrace the French spelling, go all in.
- allemagne 10y agoI hope it has a discernible impact. Otherwise it's just another set of alternative facts.
- csours 10y agoWhat are you talking about? Obama got literally the same treatment. Every president going forward will get the same treatment, and that's a good thing!
- allemagne 10y agoCan you imagine the response if a President Elect Hillary acted even a little like Trump has? If she put out even one childish tweet? If there was even a hint of the kinds of rumors about kompromat or direct ties to, say, Chinese influence -- let alone a real (whether or not it's legitimate information) dossier passed from John McCain to intelligence agencies? If the first white house press conference went even a little bit like how Trump's went? If she threatened to put Trump in jail to his face on live TV and then immediately backpedaled after being elected? If her approval rating was as low as Trump's is, and she accused the media of rigging approval polls? Imagine her picking Tillerson and people from Goldman Sachs for her cabinet. If you want to talk about hypothetical double standards I want to get to the bottom of this one first.
- dforrestwilson1 10y agoMy point was more around the shotgun blast of campaign promises she put out. How should we measure that? If Trump nails even a few of his promises, he might arguably meet more of his campaign promises than HRC would have. Yes there absolutely is a double standard here. Trump is not judged the same as a career politician.
- FireBeyond 10y agoHe needs to be, despite the fact that at times he's acted like his Presidency is something he'll fit in around everything else he has going on. And you can't really point to HRC and say that she put out a shotgun blast of campaign promises. Trump has done the same. I won't argue that in any case, increased monitoring and accountability of those in positions of power and / or influence should be something we strive for, regardless of affiliation.
- ipunchghosts 10y agoIs this plan any good? Another way to say... If Obama came up with this plan, would it be well received?
- stephancoral 10y ago>Fully fund the construction of a wall on our border with Mexico, with the “full understanding that the country of Mexico will be reimbursing the United States for the full cost of such wall”. [Pure manchild wish fulfillment] >Cancel all federal funding to sanctuary cities. >Lift the roadblocks on energy infrastructure projects like the Keystone Pipeline and allow them to move forward. >Lift the restrictions on $50 trillion dollars’ worth of American energy reserves, including shale, oil, natural gas, and clean coal. [I'm sure Secretary of State Tillerson's Exxon holdings won't benefit from this at all...no sir, this is just to help the public!] >A hiring freeze on all federal employees (except for the military, public safety, and public health) [Because who needs jobs right? It's not like the Federal gov't is one of the nation's biggest employer and source of good jobs] >Cancel every unconstitutional executive action, memorandum, and order issued by President Obama. ['unconstitutional' lol] >Reduce the business tax rate from 35% to 15%. >An act to allow school choice. [i.e. defund public schools] No, this is a garbage plan which will strip the public of the property and rights they deserve and basically funnel more money into Trump's and Co's coffers.
- edblarney 10y ago"which will strip the public of the property and rights they deserve " I don't see how any Americans 'property or rights' are being abrogated there. > In Canada, we manage our borders effectively. We're not some fascist state. I don't think it's 'totalitarian' for US gov to responsibly implement the very fair immigration laws on the books. > Pipelines are all over America. They're not evil. Granted, those that do actual damage should not be allowed - but the process is politicized in both directions. > "State Tillerson's Exxon holdings won't benefit" - Tillerson has absolved his stockholdings in Exxon. He's as free to buy and sell Oil stocks as you and I are. > A 'hiring freeze' on government staff is not entirely irresponsible wherein there is bloat. The highest media wage in the US is - guess where? Washington DC. The bloat in DC is epic. At least the sentiment to want to do something about that is reasonable. > "Reduce the business tax rate from 35% to 15%." - it's not going to be done across the board. He's going to create a VAT system which every other country has. (Meaning US does not pay taxes on products they export - same as other countries) The US without VAT is at a huge competitive disadvantage. This is actually one of the most ridiculously obvious things the US should have done a long time ago. This is not contentious really. > Allowing parents to choose schools is not 'defunding' public schools, it's allowing people to take public money allocated to their students and put it into the school of their choice. No money is coming out of the system. I understand that it's contentious, but it's irresponsible to position this as 'defunding' public schools. Most of the items on this list are reasonable. People are getting in a huff about it because it's 'Trump' and they can't stand that. If he can do just 'the better 1/2' of that list, America will be in much better shape. Eventually a Democrat will come along and put together some more socially oriented legislation.
- rory096 10y agoOne wonders if we want to encourage him to tick off these boxes.
- josefresco 10y agoI also found this to be a conundrum for Democrats. Should they hold Donald to his promises and chastise him when he doesn't follow through? Or, should they welcome his failures as said policies would be damaging to the Democratic cause? The answer is probably a little of both, but one wonders if that's the path they truly want to take given how "crossing the isle" is perceived come election day.
- jonathanstrange 10y agoI think they should grab him by the balls and criticize, oppose and expose him in any way possible. Presidents like that, they let you do that when you're in the opposition.
- MrZongle2 10y agoOne wonders why we wouldn't want to hold a politician to their promises.
- tantalor 10y agoBecause the substance of the promise is terrifying.
- knz 10y agoOne example is the ACA/Obamacare. Trump has sent very conflicting messages about repealing it but keeping some of the more popular parts. I think many people are concerned by Trump precisely because he has been so slippery on many issues and has the unique ability of being able to stand for and against something at the same time.
- DefaultUserHN 10y ago>...he has been so slippery on many issues and... stand for and against something at the same time. Because ObamaCare is not 100 percent all bad or 100 percent all good. Trump, like everyone, is allow to like the good part of ObamaCare and hate the bad part of it.
- priam 10y agoSources for each bullet point would be nice
- jbuss 10y agoHere is a lot of them https://assets.donaldjtrump.com/_landings/contract/O-TRU-102316-Contractv02.pdf https://assets.donaldjtrump.com/_landings/contract/O-TRU-102...
- priam 10y agoty
- deleted 10y ago[deleted]
- DBNO 10y agoAgreed. (Was about to make similar comment) Ideally sources would include links to Trump's tweets and, if available, video of him making the statement Edit: thanks for link to PDF of plan! Video/tweets of him talking about each point would further clarify what he means and where he stands.
- akjainaj 10y agoThis is very cool. I am not American but I hope Mr. Trump delivers on these. It'll show the rest of countries another world is possible.
- astrodust 10y agoThis "other world" you're talking about exists: backwater countries run by kleptocrats and military generals.
- akjainaj 10y agoI am talking about the list of promises. I am not judging Trump himself, and I actually don't like him. But I like what he's promised and I think it could work.
- astrodust 10y agoWhat has he promised and how could it work?
- DefaultUserHN 10y ago>What has he promised... Repeal ObamaCare. >...and how could it work? I no longer have to pay $1,000 monthly premium for a health care package I can't even use.
- astrodust 10y agoYou mean the Affordable Care Act, the one that, once repealed, will put dozens of Americans I know into serious mortal peril? Sounds great. Glad you're saving a bit of money. Also what the hell are you paying $1,000 a month for? If that isn't an argument for Medicare for everyone I don't know what is.
- DefaultUserHN 10y ago
- deleted 10y ago[deleted]
- pvdebbe 10y agoCool page. Do I remember correctly that there was a similar tracker for Obama?
- ceejayoz 10y agoPolitifact has done this for years now. http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/promises/obameter/ http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/promises/obameter/
- GiorgioG 10y agoYou may hate the messenger, but some of these are worth getting behind: - Propose a constitutional amendment that imposes term limits on all members of Congress. - A five-year ban on White House and Congressional officials becoming lobbyists after they leave government service. If he were to get these passed and get nothing else done as president, he would go down as one of the most important presidents in recent history.
- creativityland 10y agoGreat points. There are many things to get behind on that list, others not so much. We will just have to wait and see.
- sealthedeal 10y ago100% agree. This is fiiiirreeeeeeeeeee
- astrodust 10y agoTerm limits remove good politicians as much as they remove bad ones. Plus, as many have pointed out before, you need experienced leadership. If everyone, by definition, has less than eight years of experience in their role it'd be even more chaotic than it already is. The problem is not that politicians can get elected for decades, the problem is that incumbents have an unfair advantage. Fix that problem and term limits become a non-factor. Plus, to look at how ineffective rules like that are, Putin is president of Russia again despite their being term limits intended to prevent that.
- ewzimm 10y agoMuch of the experience comes from teams of people who can move on to work for others. I'd be interested to see examples of important progress made by people who had been in power for decades which could not have been reasonably achieved by people with less time in office.
- astrodust 10y ago
- _andromeda_ 10y ago> End common core Absolutely necessary. This is one of the most important one on the list. If Trump does even half of these items, America will be on track to greatness again. It will be awesome. I suspect he may achieve 90% of these.
- 24gttghh 10y agoWhat exactly do you find wrong with Common Core standards? All I've seen against it are poorly-graded homework examples turned meme without proper context.
- _andromeda_ 10y agoI think it's extremely dangerous when the federal government dictates almost all aspects of how people should lead their lives especially when it comes to education where there's always a threat of indoctrination on large scale. Communities should be able to set their own standards. People aren't as dumb as that; such that federal government shepherding is required at every turn.
- dragonwriter 10y agoCommon Core was neither developed nor mandated by the federal government, it is adopted as a mandate by numerous states independently, and developed as an initiative sponsored by the National Governors Association and the Council of Chief State School Officers. The federal government dictates very little of the substance of what is taught in schools.
- _andromeda_ 10y agoTrue and thank the Almighty for that, but the general direction is towards that. The main issue of contention here is centralization. Once that is done, it becomes easier for the federal govt to take it over. I don't want anything that remotely resembles that.
- 10y ago
- jamessb 10y agoThere is also trumptracker.io (Github repository [1]), which was posed here two months ago but flagged [2]. It includes sources for each entry. [1]: https://github.com/TrumpTracker/trumptracker.github.io https://github.com/TrumpTracker/trumptracker.github.io [2]: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=12927317 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=12927317
- egberts1 10y agoTPP is now officially person non-grata.
- wslh 10y agoIs flagging this post a bad idea? I mean, these months the world is following trump presidency with a lot of uncertainty and fear and that's why politics was almost forbidden from HN. This post contradicts the previous HN position and will ignite a lot of hate.
- ceejayoz 10y agoPolitics was forbidden from HN for a couple days, an approach that was widely criticized and reversed early.
- dang 10y agoSorry to nitpick, but I want to emphasize that we did this as part of an explicitly temporary experiment, to see what we would learn. It's true that we ended it early, but that was because we learned everything we needed in the first couple days. A week turned out to be too long for this kind of thing, especially because there are downsides to doing it (that was one of the things we learned!) It was both widely criticized and widely supported. The data suggested more HN readers liked it than disliked it.
- scrollaway 10y agoNow dang, those are alternative facts. [Aieow don't hit me - I'm kidding] The ban was very welcome imho, we could all use that break following the election. But I personally only liked it because it was temporary. I'd feel very differently had it been permanent or long term. Can you elaborate on the downsides?
- dang 10y agoOne downside was that because many people didn't hear the 'temporary' part, the longer we kept it running the more confusion was created about what the permanent policy is. Something like "most but not all politics is off-topic, except for this week when it's temporarily all off-topic" turned out to be too complicated. Another is that the political flamewarring didn't diminish, but merely shifted to arguing about site policy and the experiment. Indeed, it probably ticked up rather than down. Another is that many good stories that were clearly on-topic for HN but also had political aspects were excluded, making the front page worse not better. The bottom line is we can't run an experiment like this without changing the site itself in unintended ways. HN is a complex system that way. 'Do no harm' is at the top of our list, and we learned that there's a big leap in potential harm when you go from a 1-2 day timeframe to a week. So I'm sure we were right to end the experiment early; my internal "are things ok" geiger counter was bleeping like crazy at that point.
- dluan 10y agoFree idea - why is there no public official who runs on a digital strategy? Like a localized reddit for policies and issues on local, state, and federal levels. If you add in some ML and AI, you could come up with truly direct democracy, that is 100% open and transparent. Yes, this would be technically hard in that making it secure would take effort. But, in my mind, less effort than it would take to dismantle the electoral college, which has resulted in the opposite of direct democracy. Sam - if you did this, I'd vote for you.
- matthewmacleod 10y agoI reckon it's because 'truly direct democracy' would be an absolute clusterfuck in practice!
- shuntress 10y agoIt could still be the same republic we have now, but with an extremely accessible and simple system for looking up who is running for what position when and a short bio about them. We should be doing more work that allows as many people as possible to become well-informed with as little friction as possible.
- devopsproject 10y ago> why is there no public official who runs on a digital strategy? Most people lack basic computer literacy > truly direct democracy, that is 100% open and transparent reddit, facebook, etc are all gamed by third parties > less effort than it would take to dismantle the electoral college, which has resulted in the opposite of direct democracy the founding fathers didn't want a direct democracy. Madison says “Hence it is that democracies have ever been spectacles of turbulence and contention; have ever been found incompatible with personal security or the rights of property; and in general have been as short in their lives as they have been violent in their deaths … A republic, by which I mean a government in which a scheme of representation takes place, opens a different prospect and promises the cure for which we are seeking."
- 10y ago
- atmosx 10y agoI love this, maybe instead of track-trump.com should be track-potus.com - it would much less polarising/partisan... Now it looks as if it is run by the DMC...
- astrodust 10y agoIt's true, the DMC are political: http://www.rundmc.com/ http://www.rundmc.com/
- nolepointer 10y agoYeah, considering from the About page we see that one person behind this worked for the Hillary campaign. > Alec was a campus organizer on Hillary Clinton’s 2016 presidential campaign...
- JohnStrange 10y agoWhy? Isn't his name Trump?
- thiht 10y agoThis could, and should, be used for every president. It has clearly been created to prove Trump in particular won't (or will, who knows) hold his promises, but the execution is actually pretty great and is definitively applicable to any other president. Or political figure for what it's worth
- DanBC 10y agoYes. I'd love to see this for England. Not just for the party who gets in, but for the opposition too. They said all this in their manifesto; here's how they voted.
- Brendinooo 10y agoGood design and execution. I'll revisit this as the Trump presidency plays out. Question: Can bias come into play when evaluating statements, and how will that be handled? For example, taking the first item - building the wall and Mexico is fully reimbursing us - What if a US citizen chips in $10 to help? Is the promise broken? What about $100, $1,000, $1,000,000? Another anecdote that's kind of relevant: I followed along with Politifact's 'Obameter' for awhile, and realized that making definitive and objective statements can be difficult. I think the most troublesome aspect was the claim that a promise was broken (creating negative connotations that come with a "Broken Promise" label) when the reality was that obstructionism prevented the promise from being fulfilled.
- Eridrus 10y ago> Question: Can bias come into play when evaluating statements, and how will that be handled? Bias will definitely come into things because the informal language we use is often not precise enough to allow exact yes/no answers and doing so is reductive.
- deleted 10y ago[deleted]
- losteverything 10y agoI just don't like the feel of this.
- _andromeda_ 10y agoIf you don't mind me asking... What? The tracking of Trump or the things being tracked?
- losteverything 10y agoI don't mind. It feels like it is a GOTCHA type of thing It seems like it is not virtuous in wanting to help the 500+ men and women succeed in our capital. Tracking a persons actions or promises is used to terminate employees. Tracking (personal / individual level ) is not used - especially sharing ones results with others - to improve a process or reduce a cost etc... If this is just about the assumption that trump will fail or needs to be removed from office, then the energy should be spent on that sole task This just seems not good.
- _andromeda_ 10y ago>It feels like it is a GOTCHA type of thing l felt the same way too but I have a feeling Trump will deliver despite what the detractors may want.
- throw25231 10y agoTPP withdrawal isn't on here yet even though it has already been announced. As bad as Trump is, we should celebrate the good policies and fight the bad ones. I'm optimistic about the TPP withdrawal, the policy removing two pieces of old regulation (a policy that's been implemented successfully in Canada[0]), FDA reform, cutting down on corruption, and cutting back lobbying. I'm pessimistic about the climate related policy, immigration policy, and especially scared about foreign policy. [0]: http://www.npr.org/2015/05/26/409671996/canada-cuts-down-on-red-tape-could-it-work-in-the-u-s http://www.npr.org/2015/05/26/409671996/canada-cuts-down-on-...
- stephancoral 10y ago>cutting down on corruption, and cutting back lobbying Oh yea, like how Trump drained the swamp and staffed his administration with all these outsiders with fresh new ideas...oh wait, it's literally the RNC. And his Sec of State choice is the CEO of ExxonMobil and one of the campaign promises is literally to invest more in shale oil / natural gas / etc. Give me a break. There is nothing worth celebrating in this kleptocracy and this wishy-washy "Oh let's focus on the good stuff!" only distracts from the facts.
- mercer 10y agoWhat do you hope to achieve with such a reply, other than signalling that you hate Trump (which is a rather common sentiment here, so go you)? At no point did they argue that this makes Trump good or even acceptable, and in fact they specifically mentioned things about Trump that scare them. I found the comment to be thoughtful and nice in light of this rather gloomy situation. Sometimes it's important to celebrate good things without yelling at each other. I'm sorry for coming across as singling you out on this, but please don't consider the next paragraph aimed at you specifically. The single thing that has bothered me most during this entire election is how both Trump voters and Hillary voters spent so much time basically yelling at each other in tribal fashion. My Facebook feed was dominated by mostly pro-Hillary people who decried anyone even remotely agreeing with Trump as racist, misogynist, rural uneducated shits, and a a pro-Trump person or two who kept posting about emails and pizza-related tinfoil hat theories (and that coming from someone who generally speaking is considered a bit of a conspiracy theorist). I know for a fact that a large portion of these posts served absolutely no good purpose I could imagine other than 'virtue signalling'. I mean, don't get me wrong, if I had to pick a side I'd be in the Hillary camp. I have opinions too. And sometimes I've expressed them in ways and places where it mostly just benefited me as a person somehow. I'm not perfect. But it frustrates me to no end to see people just yelling at each other. It seems less of an issue in my real-world interactions, but then my real world consists of people who mostly agree with me. Without targeting you specifically, I really hope everyone here, myself included, can avoid being part of the screaming mobs. One of my favorite things about this place is that it still often challenges my thinking (I'm less of a functional programming zealot, and one of my new year's resolutions is to give emacs a real shot, for example), and I really hope we can at the very least bring some of this quality even to political discussions, because we do have a lot more influence than we think.
- sctb 10y agoReaders might be interested to know that Sam is one of the people behind this project (http://www.track-trump.com/about http://www.track-trump.com/about). The submitted title made that explicit (“Sam Altman Presents Track Trump”) but we've reverted that in accordance with the guidelines (https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html).
- randcraw 10y agoI'd like to see a site track Trump's Truthiness as well. But I fear we'd need long long ints to avoid overflow...
- priam 10y agoThe doodle Trump should be updated w/ gold colored drapes.
- lukas099 10y ago> A requirement that for every new federal regulation, two existing regulations be dropped. > Under Chief of Staff Reince Priebus issued a memorandum (pg. 1, pg. 2) asking federal agency heads to postpone or freeze any new or pending regulations, with some exceptions noted in Sec. 3 of the memo. From the memo: """ Notify the OMB Director promptly of any regulations that, in your view, should be excluded from the directives ... because those regulations affect critical health, safety, financial, or national security matters ... The OMB Director will review any such notifications and determine whether such conclusion is appropriate under the circumstances. """ I agree that non-elected policymakers have too much power to enact regulations with criminal penalties under force of law, but I feel that this measure will just lead to more policies being labeled "health" or "national security" etc., and not amount to any real reduction in regulation.
- DefaultUserHN 10y agoTrump hates PC language. Trump is not about to let corrupt politicians redefine mundane things as "National Security".
- tinalumfoil 10y ago> [announce] Withdraw from the Trans-Pacific Partnership. Didn't trump do this already?
- mjmsmith 10y agoDoes this offer anything that trumptracker.github.io doesn't?
- vargalas 10y agoThe facebook share button doesnt work on the site.
- sorokod 10y agoWould be much better if each point was linked to a relevant video or videos.