4 ms·
Kim Dotcom’s Megaupload 2.0 Will Utilize Blockchain Technology
- PolBaladas 10y agodropchain.tech
- quickben 10y agoThere is an interesting pattern developing lately. From the numerous examples: Lavabit relaunch now requires name/personal details on signing up for the email. Now the Megaupload 2.0 will add an exact record to their service. How are all these services that praised anonymity now requiring less of it?
- devoply 10y agoAt the end of the day they have to cover their ass. So they are doing things that if they end up in court, they can use to defend themselves.
- mike-cardwell 10y agoLavabit now accepts Bitcoin and requires no personal information. I just signed up without supplying a name or address and using Bitcoin. [edit] Also worth noting that I signed up using the Tor Browser Bundle and that there was no issue, no captchas etc.
- colordrops 10y agoAlso Signal (at least on android) requires access to a bunch of permissions as well as your phone number. Not sure why everyone is so hyped on Signal.
- TazeTSchnitzel 10y agoDidn't he already create a Megaupload successor, i.e. mega.co.nz?
- citrusui 10y agoYes, but he resigned in 2013 (the same year MEGA was launched) in order to focus on his political career[0]. Bill Liu, who had some control over MEGA, was arrested in November, a couple of months ago[1]. [0]: http://geeksnack.com/mega-founder-reveals-bill-liu-5th-most-wanted-in-china-controls-mega/ http://geeksnack.com/mega-founder-reveals-bill-liu-5th-most-... [1]: http://i.stuff.co.nz/auckland/local-news/national-news/86407030/Fugitive-Chinese-businessman-living-in-New-Zealand-for-15-years-arrested-in-China http://i.stuff.co.nz/auckland/local-news/national-news/86407...
- Terr_ 10y agoYet another investment scam from a lifetime fraudster. Isn't he due to change his last name again? Hopefully his undeserved Robin-Hood glamour from government-troubles has faded by now.
- disordinary 10y agoI don't know, Megaupload and mega.co.nz are and were legitimate products and services. Surely a fraudster who was after investment scams wouldn't actually deliver products?
- Terr_ 10y agoOne of the few advertised products he's ever delivered, really. There's a decent writeup [0] for some of his past run-ins with the law and crazy claims. Come to think of it, there are some Trumpesque parallels. https://www.wired.com/2012/01/kim-dotcom/ https://www.wired.com/2012/01/kim-dotcom/
- vorg 10y agoSounds to me like he's providing a service that enables people to get around the government-backed scams of never ending copyrights. When the copyright's about to expire, the U.S. govt bullies other govts into signing another treaty extending the time period.
- Tree1993 10y agosia coin will encrypt your data before upload and it's totally blockchain—based. http://sia.tech/ http://sia.tech/
- PolBaladas 10y agoCheck dropchain.tech out! Decentralized cloud storage and notarization service based on Ethereum's Blockchain. http://dropchain.tech/ http://dropchain.tech/
- forrestthewoods 10y agoHe made $300,000,000.00 off MegaUpload off the backs of actual content creators. He knowingly and willingly broke the law. He's scum and he deserves to rot in jail. </UnpopularOpinion>
- deftnerd 10y agoIt's an unpopular opinion because it's childishly simplistic. You could say the same thing about the internet providers, where streaming media of copyrighted content consists of the majority of their traffic. The providers do not know what streams are valid or invalid, and we do not want them to have the ability or right to monitor all of our internet traffic to determine that. They know that many of their users are likely streaming or downloading media from sources that do not compensate the content creators. But they also know that if they start identifying that, then they'll start being liable. Kim Dotcom was in the same situation. He knew that people on his platform were likely using it for file storage of files they didn't own the distribution rights to or own a license to have a personal copy of. He was legally been unable to start going through those and removing access (unless reported through a DMCA-like-mechanism) because then he would be moderating his platform and that opens him up to liability if his moderation tactics are not 100% effective. Safe Harbor provisions are important and he was trying to keep them in place for his service.
- agumonkey 10y agoSad part is for people who used it extensively for legitimate purposes and lost important data. Even businesses.
- atomical 10y agoI have never heard of a business using Mega.
- poisonarena 10y agoI used it all the time to send, host files for clients
- RichardHeart 10y agotldr; He has his own implementation of lightning network called "bitcache" and plans to use it as a payment method on his file sharing system. This seems more like a marketing piece for megaupload 2 than it does an interesting article on technology use.