5 ms·
> Humanity can cope with the effects, and do so with relative ease. People in the richer countries most likely. The main concern with climate change are the ef
by jcfrei 10y ago
> Humanity can cope with the effects, and do so with relative ease.
People in the richer countries most likely. The main concern with climate change are the effects on poorer countries in Southeast Asia.
- marcosdumay 10y ago> People in the richer countries most likely. Why do people here always say that? Are you expecting the consequences of Global Warming to follow some predictable pattern? Or that previously existing capital will suffice to fight long-lasting changes? I can't imagine any of the above being true. Maybe for a short while, but not on the long term.
- jcfrei 10y agoI'm saying that people in richer countries will feel the effects of global warming less - not saying the effects of global warming will be small. A few reasons are: Fewer people live close to the coast. We spend relatively speaking less money on food, so we can more easily afford higher prices. More advanced agriculture can better adapt to higher temperatures. Stable governments can more effectively change and enforce policies, etc.
- marcosdumay 10y agoI grant you that stable governments can help. Overall, I was trying to point that the planet changing may cause rich countries to stop being rich. You sped less on food today, but if you are unlucky and food prices go up, the extra expending can easily descapitalize you.
- MagnumOpus 10y ago> Or that previously existing capital will suffice to fight long-lasting changes This. The Netherlands has been fighting high sea levels, and winning, for centuries. Rich places like NYC and the SF Bay can do so as well. And of course: If food is only 15% of your disposable income, a doubling of global food prices is a nuisance; if it is 60%, a doubling of prices sends your family into starvation.