4 ms·

The Voder, the First Machine to Create Human Speech

57 points by Hooke 10y ago

guiomie 10y ago
I really enjoyed the video linked in the article. I wasn't sure what to expect, I found the Voder "voice" slightly creepy. Sadly I could not find an emulator or tool online to input text and get a Voder audio output.
- khedoros1 10y ago
  > Sadly I could not find an emulator or tool online to input text and get a Voder audio output. It seems like you'd need samples of the individual sound channels from the machine, and then a program to map the text to timed signals to produce the different sounds, along with pitch shifts, etc. Something similar to MIDI, maybe (vibrato, pitch shift, and the different sounds as different instrument numbers seems like it would work).
- JoeDaDude 10y ago
  Part of the charm of the machine is the control the operator has to give inflections, tone, and timing. I think a text-to-voder emulator would miss a lot of the variation heard in the demo and would instead sound stale and less lifelike.
Isamu 10y ago
Not the first. Maybe the first electronic one. Some from wikipedia: .. the bellows-operated "acoustic-mechanical speech machine" of Wolfgang von Kempelen of Pressburg, Hungary, described in a 1791 paper. This machine added models of the tongue and lips, enabling it to produce consonants as well as vowels. In 1837, Charles Wheatstone produced a "speaking machine" based on von Kempelen's design, and in 1846, Joseph Faber exhibited the "Euphonia". In 1923 Paget resurrected Wheatstone's design.
joezydeco 10y ago
The Voder begat the Vocoder, which begat SIGSALY. SIGSALY was a highly classified method of coding, one-time pad encrypting, and decoding voice transmissions during World War II. Churchill used it to communicate with the US and Allied commanders during wartime. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ev1Mc_rOM74 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ev1Mc_rOM74
- versteegen 10y ago
  I never managed to find any recording online of what it actually sounded like. I'd love to hear it. "A recording of Churchill talking to Roosevelt is on display in the British Parliament Building. It is very interesting to hear since the timing of the recorded signal occasionally varies from that received. The spoken words were added to a very loud Beethoven recording which can occasionally be heard." So if I ever visit the UK I know where to go.
woofyman 10y ago
Kraftwerk immediately came to mind.
schwarrrtz 10y ago
99 Percent Invisible has a great episode on this device: http://99percentinvisible.org/episode/vox-ex-machina/ http://99percentinvisible.org/episode/vox-ex-machina/
SN76477 10y ago
If you have an old Ensoniq sampler you can get a voder for it. http://www.chickensys.com/products2/sounds/waveboy/ http://www.chickensys.com/products2/sounds/waveboy/
deleted 10y ago
[deleted]
userbinator 10y ago
Even if it sounded like a robot demon Maybe a fitting name for it would be Dorth Voder. More seriously, here's an amazingly small JS speech synth based on a similar principle (formant synthesis), and thus it has the same "robotic" sound: http://heckmeck.de/demoscene/tiny-speech-synth-js/ http://heckmeck.de/demoscene/tiny-speech-synth-js/ http://www.p01.org/JS1K_Speech_Synthesizer/ http://www.p01.org/JS1K_Speech_Synthesizer/
djh_ 10y ago
I used Voder as a sample for a piece of music I made. Makes a really great sample, really cool sound, particularly the different inflections. https://soundcloud.com/acadiamusic/she-saw-me https://soundcloud.com/acadiamusic/she-saw-me Sample starts at 1:35.
- kakarot 10y ago
  I enjoyed that. Thanks for sharing ~
  - djh_ 10y ago
    Thanks!
drcode 10y ago
It's interesting how lifelike it sounded (comparatively speaking) and how much better it sounds than early electronic speech systems (like the Speak&Spell or the C64 Sam https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y0uexj4OsA4 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y0uexj4OsA4)
JoeDaDude 10y ago
I've contemplated recreating this machine, in part because I'd like to "play" it. There is plenty of material on the design and workings of the device but there is precious little material on how the operators (referred to as "girls" in the demo) were trained, a process that took months. If anyone has access to such training material, please contact me: The_Amazing_Dr_T (remove underlines) at gmail dot com
angersock 10y ago
There is a great book called "How To Wreck a Nice Beach" ( https://www.amazon.com/How-Wreck-Nice-Beach-Vocoder/dp/1612190928 https://www.amazon.com/How-Wreck-Nice-Beach-Vocoder/dp/16121... ) about the history of voder/vocoders. The title comes from a difficulty in synthesizing the phrase "How to Recognize Speech" and having it come out "How to Wreck a Nice Beach". :)
- brianzelip 10y ago
  Such a thorough and weirdo book!

57 points by Hooke 10y ago

I really enjoyed the video linked in the article. I wasn't sure what to expect, I found the Voder "voice" slightly creepy. Sadly I could not find an emulator or tool online to input text and get a Voder audio output.

khedoros1 10y ago
> Sadly I could not find an emulator or tool online to input text and get a Voder audio output. It seems like you'd need samples of the individual sound channels from the machine, and then a program to map the text to timed signals to produce the different sounds, along with pitch shifts, etc. Something similar to MIDI, maybe (vibrato, pitch shift, and the different sounds as different instrument numbers seems like it would work).
JoeDaDude 10y ago
Part of the charm of the machine is the control the operator has to give inflections, tone, and timing. I think a text-to-voder emulator would miss a lot of the variation heard in the demo and would instead sound stale and less lifelike.

Isamu 10y ago

Not the first. Maybe the first electronic one. Some from wikipedia: .. the bellows-operated "acoustic-mechanical speech machine" of Wolfgang von Kempelen of Pressburg, Hungary, described in a 1791 paper. This machine added models of the tongue and lips, enabling it to produce consonants as well as vowels. In 1837, Charles Wheatstone produced a "speaking machine" based on von Kempelen's design, and in 1846, Joseph Faber exhibited the "Euphonia". In 1923 Paget resurrected Wheatstone's design.

joezydeco 10y ago

The Voder begat the Vocoder, which begat SIGSALY. SIGSALY was a highly classified method of coding, one-time pad encrypting, and decoding voice transmissions during World War II. Churchill used it to communicate with the US and Allied commanders during wartime. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ev1Mc_rOM74 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ev1Mc_rOM74

versteegen 10y ago
I never managed to find any recording online of what it actually sounded like. I'd love to hear it. "A recording of Churchill talking to Roosevelt is on display in the British Parliament Building. It is very interesting to hear since the timing of the recorded signal occasionally varies from that received. The spoken words were added to a very loud Beethoven recording which can occasionally be heard." So if I ever visit the UK I know where to go.

woofyman 10y ago

Kraftwerk immediately came to mind.

schwarrrtz 10y ago

99 Percent Invisible has a great episode on this device: http://99percentinvisible.org/episode/vox-ex-machina/ http://99percentinvisible.org/episode/vox-ex-machina/

SN76477 10y ago

If you have an old Ensoniq sampler you can get a voder for it. http://www.chickensys.com/products2/sounds/waveboy/ http://www.chickensys.com/products2/sounds/waveboy/

deleted 10y ago

[deleted]

userbinator 10y ago

Even if it sounded like a robot demon Maybe a fitting name for it would be Dorth Voder. More seriously, here's an amazingly small JS speech synth based on a similar principle (formant synthesis), and thus it has the same "robotic" sound: http://heckmeck.de/demoscene/tiny-speech-synth-js/ http://heckmeck.de/demoscene/tiny-speech-synth-js/ http://www.p01.org/JS1K_Speech_Synthesizer/ http://www.p01.org/JS1K_Speech_Synthesizer/

djh_ 10y ago

I used Voder as a sample for a piece of music I made. Makes a really great sample, really cool sound, particularly the different inflections. https://soundcloud.com/acadiamusic/she-saw-me https://soundcloud.com/acadiamusic/she-saw-me Sample starts at 1:35.

kakarot 10y ago
I enjoyed that. Thanks for sharing ~
- djh_ 10y ago
  Thanks!

drcode 10y ago

It's interesting how lifelike it sounded (comparatively speaking) and how much better it sounds than early electronic speech systems (like the Speak&Spell or the C64 Sam https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y0uexj4OsA4 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y0uexj4OsA4)

JoeDaDude 10y ago

I've contemplated recreating this machine, in part because I'd like to "play" it. There is plenty of material on the design and workings of the device but there is precious little material on how the operators (referred to as "girls" in the demo) were trained, a process that took months. If anyone has access to such training material, please contact me: The_Amazing_Dr_T (remove underlines) at gmail dot com

angersock 10y ago

There is a great book called "How To Wreck a Nice Beach" ( https://www.amazon.com/How-Wreck-Nice-Beach-Vocoder/dp/1612190928 https://www.amazon.com/How-Wreck-Nice-Beach-Vocoder/dp/16121... ) about the history of voder/vocoders. The title comes from a difficulty in synthesizing the phrase "How to Recognize Speech" and having it come out "How to Wreck a Nice Beach". :)

brianzelip 10y ago
Such a thorough and weirdo book!