4 ms·
You could also argue that if the DA had ethics they would let the FBI catch these disgusting child porn criminals. It really goes both ways. And while the FBI m
by nhumrich 10y ago
You could also argue that if the DA had ethics they would let the FBI catch these disgusting child porn criminals. It really goes both ways. And while the FBI might be criminals, who would you rather see behind jail? The people who track adults without warrants or the ones who track naked children?
- NTripleOne 10y agomemes aside, why not both?
- lightbyte 10y ago>The people who track adults without warrants This is much worse in my opinion. Doing it to catch "disgusting child porn criminals" shows they know it is wrong, but they think they can get away with it because "the ends justify the means". First they came for the child porn criminals, etc.
- Overtonwindow 10y agoTo put another way: Do the ends justify the means?
- subcosmos 10y agoI don't think you understand how awful these crimes are or how many lives they destroy. Victimized children don't really ever recover.
- Dylan16807 10y agoThe victimization of children is not the crime they're going after here.
- valkea 10y ago> who would you rather see behind jail? The people who track adults without warrants or the ones who track naked children? Give them both due process of law, and we will see who is guilty of what.