4 ms·
While I certainly wouldn't turn away multi-core performance improvements, the onus isn't entirely on Intel. A large portion of the software market still makes n
by givinguflac 10y ago
While I certainly wouldn't turn away multi-core performance improvements, the onus isn't entirely on Intel. A large portion of the software market still makes no or very poor use of multiple cores. Cranking that performance up for many apps that won't use it really isn't a selling point to the general market. It would be a boon for specialized workflows, certainly not denying that, but it's not nearly as attention grabbing or experience improving as solid integrated graphics are. Just a few years ago integrated graphics were garbage, and now they're reasonably formidable for most tasks, even some light gaming.
- varjag 10y agoWhy, about any resource intensive line of application out there does use all of CPU & GPU gains you throw at it. Adobe Premiere does, Autodesk Revit, Inventor etc. Just finished a CAD workstation build for my wife with state of the art components. The performance gain over a couple years old "pro laptop" she used before is enormous. And not just on raytraced views and renders, the whole UX is much much smoother.