4 ms·
> The Syrian atrocities. Careful there. Just because something was in Jeff Bezos Blog, is no indication of it's truth. In fact, it seems to be a good indicat
by pdx 10y ago
> The Syrian atrocities.
Careful there. Just because something was in Jeff Bezos Blog, is no indication of it's truth. In fact, it seems to be a good indication that it's not.
Are you referring to the Sarin gas that Assad used (not Russia) which is now suspected to have been rebels themselves? [1]
Or are you referring to the aid convoys that Russia destroyed? Woops, Russia claims (and has video supporting) that it was actually a ground attack, not an air attack. [2] Russia may be lying, but given the history of our administrations lies, you must remain skeptical to the U.S. claims.
[1] http://www.lrb.co.uk/v35/n24/seymour-m-hersh/whose-sarin http://www.lrb.co.uk/v35/n24/seymour-m-hersh/whose-sarin
[2] http://en.alalam.ir/news/1871790 http://en.alalam.ir/news/1871790
- refulgentis 10y agoYeesh. And you're trying to claim that any misrepresentation of these atrocities happening validates the atrocities altogether. Hundreds of thousands of innocents died, the way it happened is irrelevant to the claim it was an atrocity.
- dogma1138 10y agoAnd how many weddings did the US bomb again? Seriously mistakes happen the US bombs a hospital and its oops we're sorry, Russia may or may not hit a convoy and it's drag the to the Hague?
- deleted 10y ago[deleted]
- deleted 10y ago[deleted]