6 ms·
China's innovation is being able to adopt their society rapidly for adopting new technologies in general. Tolerating the violating of foreigner's IP laws, whic
by natermer 10y ago
China's innovation is being able to adopt their society rapidly for adopting new technologies in general.
Tolerating the violating of foreigner's IP laws, which stand in the way of progress, is one of the things that helped enable their success.
Right now China has progressed to the point were things that are done by the Chinese simply cannot be duplicated anywhere else on the planet. It's not just a matter of scaling their production... They are simply the only game in town. You CANNOT do what they do in China anywhere else.
It's no longer a issue of cheap labor. They have innovated their way past their competitors in USA and Europe.
The part where China falls short is quality control. In the mad rush to produce goods at the cheapest price possible they habitually cut corners and undermine their own foreign markets.
When USA and European companies use China to produce high quality goods they just have to have people on-site to ensure quality and use robust post-production testing. Otherwise things tend to go sideways. Right now places like Japan, Germany, and Korea have a slight end in quality, but for most purposes it's a wash.
The biggest threat to the Chinese economy is their own government policies spiraling the place into a massive depression.
It's worth noting that Panasonic does a lot of it's lithium battery manufacturing in China.
- seanmcdirmid 10y agoWhat exactly is produced in China that can't be produced elsewhere? The only thing I can think of is rare earths at cheap cost, since no one else is willing to pollute their environment so much with the lack of environemtal protections needed to achieve that. Then we have the whole QR payment systems that can't really exist without the lack of pervasive credit card infrastructure. China has lots of labor resources, they have developed supply chains that have been left to rot elsewhere, but those can be ressurected relatively quickly if the need arises. They still have no modern fabs to speak of, and can't build a decent jet turbine or avionics for their own aviations efforts.
- HillaryBriss 10y ago> they have developed supply chains that have been left to rot elsewhere, but those can be ressurected relatively quickly if the need arises how long would it take to recreate a complete electronics manufacturing supply chain outside of China? perhaps more interesting, how long would it take for one single country to develop the electronics manufacturing supply chain which China currently has?
- seanmcdirmid 10y agoSilicon Valley wasn't called Silicon Valley because it had lots of sand. It had the whole supply chain before it upped out to Asia. Even today, china does not produce many of the higher end components that go into say an iPhone, not as much as Korea, Taiwan, and Japan. The supply chain still depends on lots of imports, and none of that is coming to china anytime soon (or it would already be there, like high end fabs).
- HillaryBriss 10y agoi can grant you all of that, but i still have little idea how long it would take to resurrect the parts of the supply chain which have been moved to China (and left to rot in various places outside of China). maybe it's better to focus the question on a single region: how long would it take to resurrect the manufacturing component of SV's economy to the level it was at 25 years ago? a year or two? five years? a decade? what would the time scale be?
- seanmcdirmid 10y agoThe question is really moot as long as china is willing to do the dirty work for us at a discount (actually ruining their environment in the process), there is just no incentive to regrow that capacity. No one in the west will say no to free money. But as long as the need and incentives were there, it would be rebuilt pretty quickly, possibly in radically different and improved ways (more automation, 3D printing, upgraded processes....).
- gregpilling 10y agoIf you consider the Ipad came out in 2011, which was 5 years ago (for a few more days), I would say 5 years. Touchscreen devices make up about half of the global electronics industry, so by extension half of Shenzhen was built to accommodate that. With a focused agenda, the US could rebuild a supply chain in 5 years if it wanted to. I think it is unlikely to want to however.