3 ms·
I was agreeing until this point: > There were no mainstream dynamic programming tools more powerful than awk when NeXT was launched Maybe I'm missing somethin
by scott_karana 10y ago
I was agreeing until this point:
> There were no mainstream dynamic programming tools more powerful than awk when NeXT was launched
Maybe I'm missing something, but:
1950s: Lisp and Fortran
1972: Prolog
1977: Bourne shell and Icon
1978: C shell
1979: REXX
1980: Smalltalk-80 (on Macs, even!)
1983: Korn shell
1983: C++
1987: Perl 1.0
1988: Modula-3, and NeXT computer is launched
- jandrese 10y agoHaving dug around a bit with Awk that might be a true statement. Awk has an entire ocean of features that mere mortals are completely unaware of hidden behind the 1960s teletype optimized interface. So the statement that there were no tools more powerful than Awk might be true, but only because we don't know if there is a full fledged AI hidden under the layers of impenetrable interface.