3 ms·
>It is probably good for tourism though! As an Austrian I'm not buying that argument. It's not as if you need to tear down all the royal palaces when you aboli
by ginko 10y ago
>It is probably good for tourism though!
As an Austrian I'm not buying that argument. It's not as if you need to tear down all the royal palaces when you abolish monarchy. If anything you can give tourists deeper entry, since no one lives there anymore. Just take a look at Schloss Schönbrunn, the Imperial palace in Vienna, which has way more visitors than Buckingham palace for the simple reason that it is open the entire year.
- megablast 10y agoGood point. But you also need to take into account events like Royal weddings, which are huge for tourists.
- georgeecollins 10y agoI was kind of kidding about the tourism thing.