3 ms·

But you're cool with anonymously posting a public accusation of unprofessional behaviour without supporting evidence? (edit: apparently people are cool with th

But you're cool with anonymously posting a public accusation of unprofessional behaviour without supporting evidence? (edit: apparently people are cool with this. That's weird. I'm not claiming the parent is untrue, it's just that you shouldn't talk smack about people in public without presenting evidence if you don't use your real name.)

kevinskii 10y ago
Clearly you're being downvoted by Teodolfo's sockpuppets.
deleted 10y ago
[deleted]
helperAI 10y ago
Hey Jurgen, I'm a big fan of your work
- ericjang 10y ago
  Hey Jurgen, I'm a big fan of your work!
  - deleted 10y ago
    [deleted]
emmelaich 10y ago
To be fair that accusation is also mentioned in the article.
- ma2rten 10y ago
  Maybe I overread it, but I didn't see it.
  - cokernel 10y ago
    From paragraph 7: "He has been accused of taking credit for other people’s research and even using multiple aliases on Wikipedia to make it look as if people are agreeing with his posts."
    - dekhn 10y ago
      "Has been accused". Evidence lacking.
      - cokernel 10y ago
        I do not take a position on the accusation. The purpose of the comment to which you are responding is to support emmelaich's assertion that the accusation is mentioned in the article.
nitrogen 10y ago
if you don't use your real name From what does the supposed requirement to use one's real name derive?
- kevinskii 10y ago
  It's not a requirement. It's common decency. Accusing someone of sockpuppetry is no different than calling him a liar. Doing it from behind a pseudonym without offering any evidence is irresponsible and cowardly, as it gives that person no way to defend his reputation.
  - aoeu345 10y ago
    No one's reputation is at stake with internet comments from anonymous posters. The internet is protected from the forces that threaten physical forums where each voice is a real person. You cannot pay off the internet to talk nice about you, and you can't follow anon home and beat him up for speaking negatively. It sounds like Jurgen has accumulated some bad karma on the internet; this is not baseless accusation as much as it is keeping ourselves at a healthy level of skepticism regarding someone who has already lost our trust. The cowards with loud, strawman accusations are usually appropriately downvoted when their criticisms are out of place.

kevinskii 10y ago

Clearly you're being downvoted by Teodolfo's sockpuppets.

deleted 10y ago

[deleted]

helperAI 10y ago

Hey Jurgen, I'm a big fan of your work

ericjang 10y ago
Hey Jurgen, I'm a big fan of your work!
- deleted 10y ago
  [deleted]

emmelaich 10y ago

To be fair that accusation is also mentioned in the article.

ma2rten 10y ago
Maybe I overread it, but I didn't see it.
- cokernel 10y ago
  From paragraph 7: "He has been accused of taking credit for other people’s research and even using multiple aliases on Wikipedia to make it look as if people are agreeing with his posts."
  - dekhn 10y ago
    "Has been accused". Evidence lacking.
    - cokernel 10y ago
      I do not take a position on the accusation. The purpose of the comment to which you are responding is to support emmelaich's assertion that the accusation is mentioned in the article.

nitrogen 10y ago

if you don't use your real name From what does the supposed requirement to use one's real name derive?

kevinskii 10y ago
It's not a requirement. It's common decency. Accusing someone of sockpuppetry is no different than calling him a liar. Doing it from behind a pseudonym without offering any evidence is irresponsible and cowardly, as it gives that person no way to defend his reputation.
- aoeu345 10y ago
  No one's reputation is at stake with internet comments from anonymous posters. The internet is protected from the forces that threaten physical forums where each voice is a real person. You cannot pay off the internet to talk nice about you, and you can't follow anon home and beat him up for speaking negatively. It sounds like Jurgen has accumulated some bad karma on the internet; this is not baseless accusation as much as it is keeping ourselves at a healthy level of skepticism regarding someone who has already lost our trust. The cowards with loud, strawman accusations are usually appropriately downvoted when their criticisms are out of place.