4 ms·
And this is the current top comment. Welcome to Hacker News. (my reply gets MRA-downvoted in 3.. 2.. 1..)
by DanielleMolloy 10y ago
And this is the current top comment. Welcome to Hacker News.
(my reply gets MRA-downvoted in 3.. 2.. 1..)
- cperciva 10y agoPlease resist making comments about being downvoted. It never does any good, and makes boring reading. Also, avoid baiting users by announcing that you expect to be downvoted.
- DanielleMolloy 10y agoPlease resist trying to teach other users.
- deleted 10y ago[deleted]
- dijit 10y agoThis is completely off the subject but are you trying to indicate that he is somehow "man-splaining". Educating readers as to the code of conduct of the site is required otherwise you would be downvoted without understanding why and just blaming it on "them bloody MRA's".
- DanielleMolloy 10y agoThis is also completely off the subject, but I expect that in few minutes all my comments disappear as [flagged]. I am -20 from my score before the few comments in this thread now. The OP's strongly offensive statement is still one of the top comments for this article. Maybe there is something in here to "learn" for you guys.
- douche 10y agoComplaining about downvoting is never productive. They are just internet points.
- DanielleMolloy 10y agoInternet points that prove the point. And, as predicted, most of my comments are [flagged] now. Do you see the little story this tells?
- 77pt77 10y agoHe's just stating common HN etiquette. The rules of engagement so to speak.
- lazzlazzlazz 10y agoYou're going to be downvoted for a troll-y, baiting post that has no content. Being downvoted will not validate your hypothesis.
- DanielleMolloy 10y agoI made a statement about HN's worrying MRA hive that doesn't appear to see any problem with this top comment, but with mine (btw, you prove my point too).
- gcp 10y agoI'm sure there's quite a few people who think the OP is terribly offensive, and are appalled at the insinuation it wouldn't be downvoted or moderated. Edit: The fact that your post got flagged faster than the OP on the other hand does reinforce your point and reflects very badly on HN.
- DanielleMolloy 10y agoI know that plenty of these people exist. But the anti-fem crowd outweighs them right now, once more. At least when looking at these votes. This is worrying since, after all, this shapes the discussion, the atmosphere here and the minds of people with yet to stabilize opinions.
- gcp 10y agoI edited my post. You were, however unfortunately, completely right.
- l33tbro 10y agoI, probably like a lot of others, took this post as a tongue-in-cheek joke. I think we're all mature enough to handle it, as the humour comes from how offensive the joke is and not from some universal truth behind the statement. If it actually was meant as a serious comment and is being upvoted, then that's truly fucked up and would make me seriously question this forum. But I'm giving benefit of the doubt.
- dang 10y agoYes, it was a bad comment with predictable effects. Still, breaking the site guidelines further is not a good way to reply. This comment (and others you posted) broke the site guidelines by being unsubstantive, calling names, complaining about downvoting, and baiting users into downvoting you. Please see https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html. Any large, optionally anonymous forum such as HN will include comments that hit any reader unpleasantly (it certainly does me) as well as genuinely nasty stuff. Any trend that exists in society at large is going to show up here. Or rather, societies, since many participate and their values don't all agree. That is a major factor here and perhaps the least understood. If you generalize about HN based on the worst that stands out, in effect you contribute to worsening it, since it contributes to a view of the site as dominated by the long tail of shit, when this is not true. What's true is that HN is divided on controversial issues, just like the rest of the world is. But the vast majority of the userbase is here for civil, substantive discussion and hates this sort of trainwreck as much as you do and we do. It takes time for the system to correct itself: flamewars flare up, and abusive commments pile up, very quickly. The counterweights—downvotes and flags by thoughtful users, and moderator intervention—take longer. There's not much we can do about this time discrepancy, because reflexive behaviors are always quicker than reflective ones. (We detached this subthread from https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=13020973. https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=13020973.)