4 ms·
This is very clever, and an interesting read, but kind of disappointing results. They don't look much better than doing say... upsample to twice desired size,
by abritinthebay 10y ago
This is very clever, and an interesting read, but kind of disappointing results.
They don't look much better than doing say... upsample to twice desired size, apply basic sharpen/structure filter, downsample to desired size.
A little better? Yes. But some (like the horse) look pretty weak
- IshKebab 10y agoThey're never going to look as good as you might be expecting from films. That would require fabrication of information that doesn't really exist.
- londons_explore 10y agoThe best methods for this, using Generative Adversarial Networks, do in fact fabricate new realistic-looking information. I think it would be great to input a blurry version of a cityscape, and have it add numbers to mailboxes, litter to the streets, cracks to the sidewalk, etc.
- abritinthebay 10y agoSure, though that is actually possible - generative methods exist. I just feel it's a lot of (cool) work for very little visual benefit. It's neat, but the results are disappointing