3 ms·
Probably because no part of our collation considers them intrinsically wrong or evil. Which party would be more interested in keeping defense contractors in bu
by joezydeco 10y ago
Probably because no part of our collation considers them intrinsically wrong or evil.
Which party would be more interested in keeping defense contractors in business?
- hga 10y agoThat goes a zillions times more for defense contractors, in not considering them evil, especially including keeping them in business. Hard to win, impossible nowadays against a serious opponent, if you've let them go out of business. And many many of our troops needlessly died in WWII due to our playing catch up because we'd neglected these "merchants of death". Also goes for defense related research, etc.; our response to that is not 1 ton ANFO IEDs (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sterling_Hall_bombing https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sterling_Hall_bombing). The Romans had it right, "si vis pacem, para bellum" (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Si_vis_pacem,_para_bellum https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Si_vis_pacem,_para_bellum).