3 ms·
I think it seems simpler because Pascal differentiates the type ^integer (“pointer to integer”) from the expression i^ (“dereference i”) and didn’t originally h
by evincarofautumn 10y ago
I think it seems simpler because Pascal differentiates the type ^integer (“pointer to integer”) from the expression i^ (“dereference i”) and didn’t originally have an address-of operator—you could only get the address of a new anonymous value.
- e12e 10y agoIt's been so long, I don't really recall - but I was using object pascal which is fairly similar to free pascal: http://www.freepascal.org/docs-html/ref/refse15.html http://www.freepascal.org/docs-html/ref/refse15.html It's quite similar to c - yet I find it a little bit clearer.