3 ms·
> Lack of rigorous testing, especially long term testing. There have been hundreds of studies over decades testing the safety of these gene products. Just beca
by searine 10y ago
> Lack of rigorous testing, especially long term testing.
There have been hundreds of studies over decades testing the safety of these gene products. Just because you choose to ignore them does not mean they do not exist.
Also, just because something isn't tested each time you re-make it, doesn't me it isn't safe. How long would it take to build a car if you re-tested every part, every time?
> They have a supreme court justice who has refused to recuse himself on cases with obvious conflicts of interest. They have a massive online pr (read: propaganda) operation to keep these things out of the limelight or at least remove them quickly. They have basically taken over the most prominent FDA positions.
This is extremely paranoid and nowhere close to the truth.