4 ms·
There was a choice and these people would just not see the salaries list and participate in salary raise process. But we went all in, everyone was ok with revea
by szynszyliszys 10y ago
There was a choice and these people would just not see the salaries list and participate in salary raise process. But we went all in, everyone was ok with revealing their salaries.
- swissoak 10y agoSo there was the implicit threat that if you didn't join, you wouldn't be eligible for raises? Also, how could you enforce them not seeing the list? It's illegal for an employer to deter the discussion of compensation amongst employees.
- szynszyliszys 10y agoThey would get raises in an old way, from CEO. We are based in Poland, and as far as I know there is nothing illigal about it. Someone mentioned shoulder surfing - I believe people who would not join, would be decent enough to play by the rules and not do this.
- reledi 10y agoThese people may not have access to the document, but surely in a small company they would figure out some of the salaries either through the grapevine or shoulder surfing?
- smsm42 10y agoThat suggests either a very like-minded company (with 25 people very likely, with larger sizes less so) or tremendous amount of peer pressure. After all, if out of 25 people 24 decide to share, and 25th wants to work in this company, they don't really have a choice, do they? That person has to work with all these people after it.
- smsm42 10y agoThat suggests either a very like-minded company (with 25 people very likely, with larger sizes less so) or tremendous amount of peer pressure. After all, if out of 25 people 24 decide to share, and 25th wants to work in this company, they don't really have a choice, do they? That person has to work with all these people after it.