6 ms·
Really? A lot of governments are one of the few employers with more than 100k+ employees, and have a lot of open salaries for civil servants.
by herge 10y ago
Really? A lot of governments are one of the few employers with more than 100k+ employees, and have a lot of open salaries for civil servants.
- scrapcode 10y agoTrue, but it seems like they have a system where everyone can share feedback on whether someone else gets a raise or not. That's certainly not the case in the US Govt.
- jonasty 10y agoCorrect me if I'm wrong but aren't government positions paid the same across the board? Financial compensation is companies (particularly in tech) isn't standard across the board for a particular position, each employee can garner a different salary. There's a complex social dynamic related to that feature in companies.
- monocasa 10y agoNo, there's flexibility in the general schedule system. It both goes from $18K to $133K, and includes cost of living adjustments. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/General_Schedule_(US_civil_service_pay_scale) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/General_Schedule_(US_civil_ser...
- jermaustin1 10y agoJust looked at the Locality Adjustments, and as a person who has/does live(d) in NYC and Houston, TX, for them to have pretty much the exact same adjustment doesn't make ANY sense. My rent in Houston was $1100/mo for a 2 bed, 2 bath 1200 sqft luxury apartment in a nice development with hiking and biking trails. My rent in NYC for a 1 bed, 1 bath, 600sqft luxury apartment in a nice building with a doorman every other day (idk why) is $2300. More than 4 times the price per sqft. Every day staples are 20-100% higher in NYC than Houston. Car insurance is almost triple. Parking which used to be free and assigned is now in a garage and $200-400/mo depending on where you are (thankfully mine is in the rent). I think the government needs to re-evaluate their adjustments.
- Casseres 10y agoLocality ≠ COLA (Cost of Living Adjustment) Locality is to make a job's salary competitive with other job salaries in the local market, whereas COLA is exactly what it sounds like. Houston has a high locality rate because of all the high-paying jobs there that one could potentially get instead of the govt job. I work for the govt and receive both locality and COLA, albeit the COLA is way too low in my opinion (Honolulu).
- scrapcode 10y agoYou also have GL (for law enforcement), WS (Wage Scale), WG (Wage Grade), and for contractors the Davis Bacon Act. They all also change depending on locality. I don't know what all goes into determining locality pay, but I can say with certainty it's not just the cost of living in the area. In the WS scale the 3 highest paid is in KS, MI, and Atlanta. I think they consider what other positions in the same kind of fields are paying for the area.
- lftl 10y agoBut don't most governments have pretty rigid definitions of what your salary will be based on role and experience? This open salary implementation seems to have a lot more wiggle room for change, variance and dispute than a typical governmental role.
- lucaspiller 10y agoI'm currently working for a UN-agency (as a contractor) and the salaries for staff are fixed based upon your job level and number of years of service, so basically everyone knows what everyone else gets: http://icsc.un.org/resources/sad/ss/sal201201.pdf http://icsc.un.org/resources/sad/ss/sal201201.pdf A senior developer is usually P-3 or P-4. It may seem on the low side compared to market rates if you in New York or Geneva - but bear in mind they don't need to pay taxes and get quite a lot of other benefits. Edit: This site has more details on the salaries, benefits and theory behind it: http://www.un.org/Depts/OHRM/salaries_allowances/index.html http://www.un.org/Depts/OHRM/salaries_allowances/index.html
- co_dh 10y agoFirst, are you sure that everybody is paid according to that table? Or it's just a guide line? Secondly, if it's true, then the salary is not related to performance, and I would image people just stay there, the longer the higher salary.
- deleted 10y ago[deleted]
- takingflac 10y agoThis sums up most government jobs. Also, the job security is an added bonus. When was the last time you heard of the government having a mass layoff?
- TeMPOraL 10y ago2013? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_federal_government_shutdown_of_2013 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_federal_governme...
- takingflac 10y agoHow many people were actually fired or laid off from this? There was a bit of a kerfuffle with temporary unpaid leave and some people working without pay for a bit(they got back pay latter) but nobody lost their job.
- ThePawnBreak 10y agoAnd how's that working out for them?
- mlinksva 10y agoPretty well? Seems to me there's a big problem in the public sector of extreme difficulty of terminating non- and even anti-performers, but that's orthogonal to relatively narrow and seniority-based compensation bands. But those are just my nth-hand impressions on both. Would love to read some good papers on either or both.
- Animats 10y agoHere's the US Government salary table for GS-schedule employees.[1] Pre-Internet, this was available on a wallet-sized card. [1] https://www.opm.gov/policy-data-oversight/pay-leave/salaries-wages/salary-tables/pdf/2016/DCB.pdf https://www.opm.gov/policy-data-oversight/pay-leave/salaries...
- coldcode 10y agoGovernments are not Fortune 50 companies.