4 ms·

Does anyone have any links to the various relevant studies mentioned in this article? I'm disinclined to take the word of a popsci rag on anything.

• c0nducktr 10y ago
  It's a Reuters article republished on Scientific American. http://www.reuters.com/article/us-health-cancer-iarc-exclusive-idUSKCN12P2FW http://www.reuters.com/article/us-health-cancer-iarc-exclusi... It doesn't appear that they have released information on the actual studies at this time.
  • tremon 10y ago
    So it doesn't seem to be about the actual research documents: had been approached by interested parties, including lawyers representing Monsanto [..] and asked to release private emails as well as draft scientific documents
• shapiromatron 10y ago
  Here's the link to the WHO report: http://monographs.iarc.fr/ENG/Monographs/vol112/index.php http://monographs.iarc.fr/ENG/Monographs/vol112/index.php
  • count_zero 10y ago
    Thanks for the link. From the summary of findings on page 78: "Glyphosate is probably carcinogenic to humans (Group 2A)." From page 22 of the preamble: the category Group 2A "is used when there is limited evidence of carcinogenicity in humans and sufficient evidence of carcinogenicity in experimental animals". http://monographs.iarc.fr/ENG/Monographs/vol112/mono112-F06.pdf http://monographs.iarc.fr/ENG/Monographs/vol112/mono112-F06....
    • searine 10y ago
      Also : https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_IARC_Group_2A_carcinogens https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_IARC_Group_2A_carcinog... Something may also be classified as 2A when "Exceptionally, an agent may be classified in this group solely on the basis of limited evidence of carcinogenicity in humans." Which I think Glyphosate falls into.
  • M_Grey 10y ago
    Thanks very much!