5 ms·
Exactly my thoughts. Also, despite the message being carved in stone, after only 70 years it has deteriorated already. "There is XXX danger to visitors". Irony?
by limaoscarjuliet 10y ago
Exactly my thoughts. Also, despite the message being carved in stone, after only 70 years it has deteriorated already. "There is XXX danger to visitors". Irony?
- kabdib 10y agoLooks like vandalism.
- sophacles 10y agoI'm guessing it originally said "no danger". That gouge looks like the right size for 2 letters.
- 27182818284 10y agoYes, I had the same though that there was vandalism taking away the "no" so that it intentionally says it is dangerous
- adanto6840 10y agoThe article states that the stone does indeed say "There is no danger to visitors" so I'd assume it's vandalism.
- JulianMorrison 10y agoSabotage, deliberate. The word "no" was removed to make a point. Which makes you wonder who else will sabotage it in the years to come. Maybe the word "danger" is next to go?
- mjevans 10y agoMy thoughts were that the sign was left modified as they cannot conclusively say there is NO danger.