4 ms·

Ah, cool then. (Sarcasm, not exactly the best conversational device for short-form plain-text, though.)

• sitkack 10y ago
  Only partially sarcasm, those that are actually after the truth and not controlled by either money or political forces are dangerous. Truth is an agenda worse than politics and money, it stands by itself.
  • throwaway98237 10y ago
    That's quite an argument to engage in only a line. First, I say, except for logical truths every "truth" is subjective, and thus does not stand by itself but rather stands within context of the subject that holds it (i.e. bias). Second, personally I think this is so rare as to be almost always a non-issue. Everyone has an agenda, and one's argument can and should be evaluated accordingly.
    • nitrogen 10y ago
      I find the word "agenda" overused as a slur against anyone wanting to change the status quo. Is there a more positive wors that can be used to describe, for example, someone whose "agenda" is to find and expose government corruption?
      • nitrogen 10y ago
        That should read "word", not "wors"; typing on a phone is fraught with peril.