6 ms·
IMO Mozilla would be wise to spend time on improving Firefox’s memory footprint and responsiveness. As it is it’s slower and more cumbersome than Chrome (at lea
by bananaoomarang 10y ago
IMO Mozilla would be wise to spend time on improving Firefox’s memory footprint and responsiveness. As it is it’s slower and more cumbersome than Chrome (at least on Linux). Some of these features are nice, sure, but perhaps they should be provided as extensions? The core user experience is browsing, and right now that’s a huge pain.
- qwertyuiop924 10y agoThese are all extensions. By default, you won't get any of this: it's opt-in. As for memory footprint and responsiveness, work is being done on it, IIRC, as well as a lot of other things.