5 ms·
The best food city has to be the one with the most diversity of foods. If you want the best food of a certain cuisine, of course it would be hard to beat the c
by lifeformed 10y ago
The best food city has to be the one with the most diversity of foods. If you want the best food of a certain cuisine, of course it would be hard to beat the cuisine's homeland. But some cities are better than others in providing high-quality (but maybe not the absolute best) examples of international cuisines.
Another factor is that, to me, the "best food city" is one that has excellent cheap food. This is also a factor proportional to the city's diversity. Some cities may have amazing high-end restaurants, but I'm not going to eat at a nice sit-down restaurant all the time (maybe even rarely). A city may have many Michelin stars, but when's the last time you considered a Michelin place for lunch? How many times would you go to one, maybe once a year, or less?
Because of this, I would rate many American coastal cities as some of the best places for food because of the diversity.
- seanmcdirmid 10y agoTokyo is pretty cheap for normal people. At least, it feels cheaper than an American coastal city depending on swings in the exchange rate. This includes lower end foreign resteraunts.
- Jach 10y agoI hear about how there are lots of food challenges in Tokyo, I have a sort of fantasy of eating on the super cheap if I visit by winning enough of them...
- rybosome 10y agoThat was my impression when I visited last year. Granted, USD was doing quite well against JPY at the time, but I was shocked at how much more affordable restaurants were in Tokyo than Seattle. My first meal there was an $8 bowl of ramen, and it was easily the best I've ever had.
- dilemma 10y agoI think Tokyo fits your criteria very well, too.