3 ms·
The trolley problem is just an extreme example, that people can easily understand and think about. Less extreme versions of it occur all the time. For example
by greeneggs 10y ago
The trolley problem is just an extreme example, that people can easily understand and think about. Less extreme versions of it occur all the time.
For example, say you are driving along a road, passing a bicyclist. You'd like to give the cyclist more room, but there's an oncoming car in the lane next to you. How much room do you give? At exactly what threshold do you decide to wait to pass the cyclist? What if the cyclist is a kid?
All the time, the driver has to make decisions that trade off the safety of multiple parties, from the car's occupants to other drivers, to bicyclists and pedestrians. In reality, these will almost always be statistical tradeoffs, and usually comparing very small probabilities of accidents, but they are still real ethical decisions that have to be made.
- inimino 10y agoExactly, and if a few high-profile accidents give a manufacturer a reputation as a public menace, lawsuits and legislation won't be far behind.
- deleted 10y ago[deleted]
- imtringued 10y agoIf there is an oncoming car you don't overtake.
- AstralStorm 10y agoI know a plenty of people that attempt to squeeze past the cyclist giving them scant room. Almost 100% of the time, despite it being forbidden by law here.
- Scarblac 10y agoIf the road is really broad and there is plenty of space for the cyclist and you without getting close to the lane the oncoming car is in, of course you overtake. The interesting case is in between.