4 ms·
The problem is the IoT devices don't harm their owners or the company that built them but rather other targets on the internet.
by kazagistar 10y ago
The problem is the IoT devices don't harm their owners or the company that built them but rather other targets on the internet.
- xanderstrike 10y agoProvided they continue to function as expected and aren't harming the network they're a part of. Both are big assumptions.
- the8472 10y agoIt's probably not a great idea, but how about legalizing hacking for self-defense? If you get DoSed then those devices, are fair game. That would shift incentives back to the owners to some extent, since they're basically acceptable targets as long as their devices are insecure.
- justinlardinois 10y agoI'm not sure how that would help the problem. When you're talking about thousands or more devices, counterattacking them individually wouldn't be feasible. Also I imagine many botnet owners secure the devices they take over so that others can't steal them for their own botnet.
- NeutronBoy 10y agoThis comment shows the disconnect between many comments I read on this forum[0] and the real world, frankly. Whenever Apple or Samsung release an update for their smartphones, I have a to help family members click through dialogs to install them. How are they supposed to assess and implement security for an IP camera they bought at a department store? How would they do it anyway? Is the expectation that they fire up Wireshark, identify traffic flows to and from their device, then configure the firewall on their consumer-grade router to limit this traffic? [0] previously read just '... disconnect between this forum ...'
- uhhuhuh 10y agoPlease don't generalize from a single comment to "this forum". You're painting thousands of people with a very broad brush.
- NeutronBoy 10y agoFair point, have updated my comment.
- enraged_camel 10y agoThis is a Bad Idea, because you have no way of knowing whether the devices you are "counter-hacking" are simple IoT devices or if they perform a critical function of some sort. The last thing you want to do is accidentally take offline/brick an Internet-connected medical device or computer at a hospital ER room, for instance, since it might literally result in someone's death.
- the8472 10y agoThat sounds like a "but think of the children" argument to me. We can conjure up ways how anything can go wrong. But should we really worry about that scenario? If you have internet-exploitable and already-exploited devices in the ER room, haven't the horses left the barn already?
- crdoconnor 10y agoStolen IoT data is the perfect way to case a house. That's a market waiting to happen.
- kasey_junk 10y agoDo people still case houses? I know at least in my area burglaries are waaaaaay down because unloading the stuff inside is basically impossible. The few remaining burglaries are essentially smash the door run in and grab any loose cash, unlocked guns or jewelry and run out. To pull that off it seems easier to do it the old fashioned way, by ringing the door bell. I'd be much more worried about identity theft & credit card theft with IoT devices than physical theft.
- IncRnd 10y agoThose are the burglars who aren't able to peer inside multiple homes via xbox cameras.