4 ms·
In my opinion this is a very important battle, even if this will be a 100% internal API. Think about the possible scenario - no one touches one of the endpoints
by iddogino 10y ago
In my opinion this is a very important battle, even if this will be a 100% internal API. Think about the possible scenario - no one touches one of the endpoints for 18 months. A new developer comes in and wants to use it. There are no docs and no one remembers what's going on there. == mess.
- ameesdotme 10y agoThis is the issue I am mostly worried about. Not having documentation is risky, as it causes your team to depend on human-resources instead.
- new_hackers 10y agoor the code. depending on this API, it could just be easier to look at the code. Seriously, if it is just exposing some database tables, then I don't necessarily always see the point of extra documentation. With extra docs you have to answer: * Who writes the docs? * Who reads the docs? * Where are the docs? * When are the docs written? * How are the docs written? Basically, unless you have a dead-simple process, or a docs champion, you've just created another project. If you can answer these questions: * Who writes the codez? * Who reads the codez? * Where are the codez? * When are the codez written? * How are the codez written? Then the simplest thing may be "just read the code"