12 ms·
The last place I want to have work related conversations stored is FB servers.
by gjolund 10y ago
The last place I want to have work related conversations stored is FB servers.
- Pamar 10y agoI work in an European company. I doubt this will get any traction outside of US.
- cheriot 10y agoIt was made in London. At least until someone triggers article 50 it's more European than American :) More to your point, the article mentions getting the privacy/security certifications that companies look for. And if you're paying for the product, there's not the privacy concerns as when you are the product, etc. I'm actually impressed with this thing so far.
- Pamar 10y agoI am in Germany. The NSA debacle made a lot of important people quite unhappy here, not to mention the current tensions between DBank & DOJ and so on... - so I am afraid we would interpret this a bit like Apple's labels, except in this case we would read: Designed in NSA - Made in UK.
- cheriot 10y agoIs there an IT angle on the DBank/DOJ story or is this just anti-USA?
- Pamar 10y agoSome have interpreted the DOJ fine to be a sort of retaliation for fines applied by EU to Apple/Google (especially the first for the Ireland tax rebates). I have no particular authority in saying if this is actually the case or not, but my feeling is that in Europe (and especially in Germany) there will be a lot of resistance towards Facebook solutions (the recent Whatsapp decision to share data with the parent company is another thing that did not sit well here, for example).
- pmlnr 10y agoI work for a European company - unfortunately owned by a US holding. We're already using it. This, unfortunately, might get traction here as well.
- soft_dev_person 10y agoNorway is one of the major beta markets and full of early adopters. Though some of the companies among them likely just want to be one of the cool kids.
- pinaceae 10y agohttps://workplace.fb.com/stories/#europe https://workplace.fb.com/stories/#europe really?
- notyourwork 10y agoI don't understand your concern. Could you expand here?
- gjolund 10y agoAre you serious? Take 5 minutes to think about it and see of you can't come up with a couple reasons.
- notyourwork 10y agoYes I am serious. You providing no context isn't helpful either, thanks.
- EliRivers 10y agoI, your competitor, will pay FB for your conversations. I expect we can work out a way to do it that isn't so brazen.
- BinaryIdiot 10y agoBut if that's possible in any way FaceBook and the company paying would be subject to breaking many corporate espionage laws in addition to destroying FaceBook's enterprise business IN ITS ENTIRETY should it be found out. Seems like an insane amount of risk for such a very tiny reward.
- notyourwork 10y agoThis is exactly why I don't see how a company would be concerned. Lots of b2b relationships exist and are based on trust with legal ramifications for when that trust is broken.
- nickpsecurity 10y agoYet, each of the major carriers and RSA did it for the NSA in exchange for $30-(80?) million. Happened at plenty of other companies with or without nation state involvement. The big ones are still in business. Besides, what does the EULA say on the product? Their EULA usually says something along the lines of they can do whatever they want with your data. I'm interested to see if anyone sees something similar in the enterprise agreement.
- BinaryIdiot 10y agoBecause you'd rather your work related conversations stored in Slack? Google Hangouts? Skype? GoToMeeting? There are not very many on prem solutions that are very good, so do you not use any of them or is it specifically against Facebook and if the latter why so?
- losteric 10y agoWell my company uses Mattermost in place of slack... on premise, open source, and free.
- mcmoose75 10y agoIt's also not very good- both the desktop and iOS clients (that I use) are horribly slow to load, clunky, and require multiple (laggy) clicks just to get to a notification of a message. I'd much rather pay for something else, on-prem and open source be damned.
- it33 10y agoHi @mcmoose75, highly appreciate the feedback. Our open source community is always looking to improve and all feedback helps. May I ask how your experience was on the web with Mattermost? Regarding mobile performance, may I also ask what iPhone model and network speed you're using? We publish mobile benchmarks, and I'm just wondering if your results are the same or different: https://docs.mattermost.com/deployment/push.html#mobile-performance-benchmarks https://docs.mattermost.com/deployment/push.html#mobile-perf... The Mattermost iOS app works best on a fast connection. To accommodate slow connections, we're adding React Native (same technology as Facebook) to get competitive with Facebook's iOS app performance over time. Here's the new Mattermost iOS app roadmap and backlog: http://forum.mattermost.org/t/react-native-roadmap/2339 http://forum.mattermost.org/t/react-native-roadmap/2339 Regarding the Mattermost desktop apps, on September 30 we had one of our largest product update addressing user issues. Here's the changelog: https://docs.mattermost.com/help/apps/desktop-changelog.html https://docs.mattermost.com/help/apps/desktop-changelog.html Latest versions now available for download: http://about.mattermost.com/download/ http://about.mattermost.com/download/ Overall, we created an open source, self-hosted alternative to proprietary SaaS communication for organizations that want to minimize security, lock-in, and privacy risks. We're constantly improving, thanks to hundreds of people around the world contributing to the project. Whatever issue you're experiencing, please consider nominating an improvement to help us get to where you want us to be? https://www.mattermost.org/feature-ideas/ https://www.mattermost.org/feature-ideas/
- baby 10y agoIf you're doing anything sensitive obviously this is not a product targeting your company. I don't see what ranting about this will accomplish. Like you my company won't use it for privacy issue (we're dealing with sensitive things), but I still find that awesome.