4 ms·

Hey there! I'm Regaind's CTO and will be happy to answer your questions :) We built this as a coaching tool aimed at helping amateurs take better photos, in th

by iXce 10y ago

Hey there! I'm Regaind's CTO and will be happy to answer your questions :) We built this as a coaching tool aimed at helping amateurs take better photos, in the context of building a smart and flexible automatic roll curation system that goes beyond the "bad exposition/motion blur detection" that's often used. The end goal is to fluidify the use of photos by killing the last bottleneck: sorting.

balls187 10y ago
I haven't seen any comments that I would classify as coaching. Instead they seem to be simple critiques. "Overall, this image is good, but it could be great." https://keegan.regaind.io/p/whFZsOsRRfG4sRBGCDiA7g https://keegan.regaind.io/p/whFZsOsRRfG4sRBGCDiA7g "The blur and the subject together, so good. " https://keegan.regaind.io/p/HopS2XrnSmGhXiMg6AFoLA https://keegan.regaind.io/p/HopS2XrnSmGhXiMg6AFoLA "This is a solid image." https://keegan.regaind.io/p/USKPgJgfRE-h_n7rh2QnHg https://keegan.regaind.io/p/USKPgJgfRE-h_n7rh2QnHg "So simple, but so good" https://keegan.regaind.io/p/xbQHksWyRsOPWhW3hhs6RA https://keegan.regaind.io/p/xbQHksWyRsOPWhW3hhs6RA Don't get me wrong, I think this is pretty cool, but there is no real actionable feedback, so there unless you can guess as to what triggers the higher scores, there isn't much coaching, so much as "gaming" the AI.
- iXce 10y ago
  Hey there, Coaching/advice is provided when you score much lower than that! We kinda don't take the risk of telling you "improve your composition" when the overall picture looks good and the non-standard composition may actually be what makes it work so well. Just a few examples with coaching: https://keegan.regaind.io/p/ne5Xql3LQ4Wcp3lNTwpA3A https://keegan.regaind.io/p/ne5Xql3LQ4Wcp3lNTwpA3A https://keegan.regaind.io/p/JAi7xXNsSw6CLzALqmdNpQ https://keegan.regaind.io/p/JAi7xXNsSw6CLzALqmdNpQ https://keegan.regaind.io/p/RA1BIfwLTwmdo44ACxsctg https://keegan.regaind.io/p/RA1BIfwLTwmdo44ACxsctg
  - balls187 10y ago
    Makes sense. My bias as an Asian American: I translate a 7.4 to a 74/100 to a C, which is not a good grade, hence a desire to see coaching to achieve a score of 9.8 and above.

by iXce 10y ago

balls187 10y ago

I haven't seen any comments that I would classify as coaching. Instead they seem to be simple critiques. "Overall, this image is good, but it could be great." https://keegan.regaind.io/p/whFZsOsRRfG4sRBGCDiA7g https://keegan.regaind.io/p/whFZsOsRRfG4sRBGCDiA7g "The blur and the subject together, so good. " https://keegan.regaind.io/p/HopS2XrnSmGhXiMg6AFoLA https://keegan.regaind.io/p/HopS2XrnSmGhXiMg6AFoLA "This is a solid image." https://keegan.regaind.io/p/USKPgJgfRE-h_n7rh2QnHg https://keegan.regaind.io/p/USKPgJgfRE-h_n7rh2QnHg "So simple, but so good" https://keegan.regaind.io/p/xbQHksWyRsOPWhW3hhs6RA https://keegan.regaind.io/p/xbQHksWyRsOPWhW3hhs6RA Don't get me wrong, I think this is pretty cool, but there is no real actionable feedback, so there unless you can guess as to what triggers the higher scores, there isn't much coaching, so much as "gaming" the AI.

iXce 10y ago
Hey there, Coaching/advice is provided when you score much lower than that! We kinda don't take the risk of telling you "improve your composition" when the overall picture looks good and the non-standard composition may actually be what makes it work so well. Just a few examples with coaching: https://keegan.regaind.io/p/ne5Xql3LQ4Wcp3lNTwpA3A https://keegan.regaind.io/p/ne5Xql3LQ4Wcp3lNTwpA3A https://keegan.regaind.io/p/JAi7xXNsSw6CLzALqmdNpQ https://keegan.regaind.io/p/JAi7xXNsSw6CLzALqmdNpQ https://keegan.regaind.io/p/RA1BIfwLTwmdo44ACxsctg https://keegan.regaind.io/p/RA1BIfwLTwmdo44ACxsctg
- balls187 10y ago
  Makes sense. My bias as an Asian American: I translate a 7.4 to a 74/100 to a C, which is not a good grade, hence a desire to see coaching to achieve a score of 9.8 and above.