3 ms·
Actually there's absolutely no face detection in there !
by iXce 10y ago
Actually there's absolutely no face detection in there !
- bambax 10y agoBut it loves contrast, no? Global contrast as well as local contrast.
- bambax 10y agoNormal BW portrait, 8.5: https://keegan.regaind.io/p/YLzqGGvuSFOv7PwLl8qC8A https://keegan.regaind.io/p/YLzqGGvuSFOv7PwLl8qC8A Same image with clarity upped to 100% (horrible, IMHO), 8.6: https://keegan.regaind.io/p/JbMQUyfBTNuoAWveabPCwg https://keegan.regaind.io/p/JbMQUyfBTNuoAWveabPCwg
- iXce 10y agoIt does like contrast! Hm, the score change is sufficiently low to be within the error bars I'd say. I agree that the upped clarity is less beautiful, but it adds a nice touch of sharpness which Keegan likes a lot as well!
- aidenn0 10y agoThe first one looks too blurry to me and the second too sharp; did you try an intermediate one?
- jrockway 10y agoYou can do a lot worse with contrast/clarity than that.
- Steel_Phoenix 10y agoNo face detection? It noticed there was a baby in my picture and commented on the expression: https://keegan.regaind.io/p/XCBCz-9_TrC31c4Opa1mdQ https://keegan.regaind.io/p/XCBCz-9_TrC31c4Opa1mdQ I'm sure there are many different definitions of face detection. Care to elaborate on what kind of face detection it doesn't have?