3 ms·
To me, Keegan misses out on the art of photography and is focusing more on the "rules" of photography. That being said, it's fun to see where photos fall in it
by dddrh 10y ago
To me, Keegan misses out on the art of photography and is focusing more on the "rules" of photography.
That being said, it's fun to see where photos fall in its grading system, even if I personally disagree with it.
For example, this portrait by Vivian Maier gets a 4.2
https://keegan.regaind.io/p/9VJdlageRTusSf7Z2qDQPA https://keegan.regaind.io/p/9VJdlageRTusSf7Z2qDQPA
- throwawayReply 10y agoIf you click the slightly hidden "get more feedback" button it shows: Subject well framed: 100% Super sharp subject: 71% Great composition: 68% Pleasant blur: 57% Great lightning: 35% Well chosen background: 33% Interesting/original subject: 32% Good timing: 26% So it's not very happy with half the categories but scores 9.4/10, so the score is definitely not an unweighted mean! (geometric or arithmetic).
- iXce 10y agoThanks for the feedback! Any tip on how to make that button more salient?
- christianmann 10y agoIt looks like a dropdown / <select> box.
- iXce 10y agoI think it heavily dislikes the obstruding object at the bottom. Not his tastes :(