4 ms·
That's been my experience as well. It must use face detection rather heavily. It also doesn't like photos with no central subject.
by faitswulff 10y ago
That's been my experience as well. It must use face detection rather heavily. It also doesn't like photos with no central subject.
- iXce 10y agoActually there's absolutely no face detection in there !
- bambax 10y agoBut it loves contrast, no? Global contrast as well as local contrast.
- bambax 10y agoNormal BW portrait, 8.5: https://keegan.regaind.io/p/YLzqGGvuSFOv7PwLl8qC8A https://keegan.regaind.io/p/YLzqGGvuSFOv7PwLl8qC8A Same image with clarity upped to 100% (horrible, IMHO), 8.6: https://keegan.regaind.io/p/JbMQUyfBTNuoAWveabPCwg https://keegan.regaind.io/p/JbMQUyfBTNuoAWveabPCwg
- iXce 10y agoIt does like contrast! Hm, the score change is sufficiently low to be within the error bars I'd say. I agree that the upped clarity is less beautiful, but it adds a nice touch of sharpness which Keegan likes a lot as well!
- aidenn0 10y agoThe first one looks too blurry to me and the second too sharp; did you try an intermediate one?
- jrockway 10y agoYou can do a lot worse with contrast/clarity than that.
- Steel_Phoenix 10y agoNo face detection? It noticed there was a baby in my picture and commented on the expression: https://keegan.regaind.io/p/XCBCz-9_TrC31c4Opa1mdQ https://keegan.regaind.io/p/XCBCz-9_TrC31c4Opa1mdQ I'm sure there are many different definitions of face detection. Care to elaborate on what kind of face detection it doesn't have?