6 ms·
So they did lie when they said "Microsoft Loves Linux". https://blogs.technet.microsoft.com/windowsserver/2015/05/06/microsoft-loves-linux/ https://blogs.techne
by 0x0 10y ago
So they did lie when they said "Microsoft Loves Linux". https://blogs.technet.microsoft.com/windowsserver/2015/05/06/microsoft-loves-linux/ https://blogs.technet.microsoft.com/windowsserver/2015/05/06...
Meet the new boss, same as the old boss.
- f_m_9 10y agoThey love Linux ..as long as you only use it through their products..
- joe563323 10y agoFuck their products
- Piskvorrr 10y agoEmbrace, Extend, Extinguish. Hello again MS, for a moment I was getting worried about you straying from your proven strategy.
- jewbacca 10y agoSeriously. If this does turn out to be intentional on Microsoft's part, then there goes every last shred of trust and goodwill they've spent the last 10 years rebuilding. (and, honestly, were finally succeeding at, to the point where I'm very close to willing to give them the benefit of the doubt here: how the hell could the benefits of such a thing come anywhere near to outweighing the amount of damage it would do?)
- lemagedurage 10y ago10 years? I remember the lawsuit against TomTom in 2009, because they used the FAT32 filesystem through open source drivers. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Microsoft_Corp._v._TomTom_Inc https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Microsoft_Corp._v._TomTom_Inc.
- Piskvorrr 10y agoMeh. For me, the last drop was "You WANT the X, admit it! (Not like you have a choice, we force-upgraded your computer anyway, no matter what you chose)" This is just Business As Usual.
- ashitlerferad 10y agoThe love Linux... as long as Linux users pay their patent fees
- coldtea 10y ago>So they did lie when they said "Microsoft Loves Linux". No, the title and "secret agreement" theory is just BS. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Occam%27s_razor https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Occam%27s_razor >Meet the new boss, same as the old boss. MS hasn't been the boss of anyone much ever since 2005 or so... http://www.paulgraham.com/microsoft.html http://www.paulgraham.com/microsoft.html http://www.joelonsoftware.com/articles/APIWar.html http://www.joelonsoftware.com/articles/APIWar.html
- rndgermandude 10y agoThen why did a Lenovo employee say there is an agreement? http://imgur.com/a/niewu http://imgur.com/a/niewu
- akx 10y agoThey might be misguided. Until there's an official announcement one way or another, I wouldn't pay too much attention to some random Lenovo customer service guy.
- Sylos 10y agoRight, but there isn't going to be an official announcement, unless a hundred thousand people jump to premature conclusions and bring out their pitchforks. I agree that it's not terribly smart to draw a conclusion at this point in time, but it's potentially more malicious, if we don't.
- sevensor 10y agoRegardless of whether such an agreement exists, and regardless of whether it's a secret if it does exist, I still have my pitchfork out. Lenovo had already lost my good will for their various other shenanigans over the last couple of years, but locking down the machine in a way that makes it impossible to install an alternative OS has decisively lost them my business.
- DanBC 10y ago
- Fice 10y agoThey do not love or hate Linux, open source, or anything, they just do whatever makes more money. It's business.
- sliken 10y agoHeh, well there's a small footnote. Microsoft loves Linux users. So sure, they want ubuntu to run on windows, so they can get into the container market. So sure they will sell office in the cloud to target the legions of chromebook users. Not that they would ship office for linux. Nor would they consider supporting linux on their surface books. The locking linux out of various platforms with EFI seems to be progressing nicely. But sure, microsoft will meet you half way to steal your customers and try to find out some other way to lock them into a microsoft platform.