4 ms·
Ask HN: Do you worry that your product will be killed by one of the tech giants?
Today Google released Google trips https://get.google.com/trips
Not to say it's definitely going to be successful, but it must be a bad news for people building travel apps.
These days big companies like Google and microsoft roll out small products like trips from time to time, with so many resources to spare, they have a bigger chance to succeed than startups.
If you are building a internet product, do you worry that one day a tech giant will crash you? If so what can you do about it?
- p333347 10y agoNot at all. It seems these bigcos in their desire to diversify either produce an inferior version of pre existing hit software which will eventually fizzle out (or kept under life support), or simply buy out a viable competitor to the said pre existing hit software. So, unless you are trying to compete with bigcos' A game software products, you shouldn't worry. I don't. One might even look to create a viable competitor and seek a buyout, enjoy the spoils for a while and move on to next idea. Again, I don't.
- mrg3_2013 10y agoI do. This may not be popular opinion - but the mere fact that they can build what you can after you have "proved" the market for them is always risky IMO. Ofcourse, bigcos may not be able as nimble as you are - so there's hope. Incidentally, I asked a question today due to the fear of same thing.
- deleted 10y ago[deleted]
- codegeek 10y agoI wouldn't hold my breath with google. Lets see: - Google Wave (dead) - Google talk (dead) - Google Voice (dead) - Google trips (...._ If anything, google may offer to buy you out if they like your product good enough. So if that counts as being killed, then yea may be.
- dhruvkar 10y agoIs Google Voice considered dead? It's been my primary number for ~4 years now, and yes, it's not 100% reliable (spotty forwarding once in a while), it's still serving me well.
- recmend 10y agoDo not worry about things that you don't control. Our job as innovators is to find opportunities that we believe in and give our best, independent of the outcome. Moreover, Tech giants cannot focus and move as fast as a tiny startup.
- endswapper 10y agoCouldn't agree with this more, "Do not worry about things that you don't control." And I'd like to add that there are plenty of things to worry about. Channel your energy there.
- shanwang 10y agoIn theory you are right, but in reality, when you are faced with multiple choices of startup ideas, shouldn't this be a major factor on deciding which one to act on?
- endswapper 10y agoNo. The market, and your understanding of it, should be a major factor. The fact that 800 pound gorillas have more resources is just an excuse to not do something. Besides, those resources could just as easily be used to acquire your idea if you do it better.
- cureyourhead 10y agoBut you can control it. Adopt a strategy resilient to big company interference. Don't think of yourself as a fake victim of big companies. There's always things you can do. Have you forgotten the even basic lessons of MS vs IBM, you fucking idiots?
- shanwang 10y agowatch your language
- 10y ago
- toast0 10y agoGoogle releasing their product brings visibility to the market. If you have a travel app, now ou can say "it's like google trips, but we launched last year" and people will have some idea because of the google hype cycle. Instead of saying "it's like yahoo travel trip planner, except we didn't shut down"
- taprun 10y agoThe more specific your audience, the less likely that a big company will replicate your solution. Building a faster database? You're going to get clobbered. Building a better system for managing small postage stamp collections? You're probably safe.
- irremediable 10y agoI'm not in a start-up at the minute, and I should make it clear that I've not yet worked in a senior role at one. That said, I feel like most start-ups would be happy to reach the level of success where this is a problem!