2 ms·
Sounds like a PR article written just in time to rescue spaceX. The way data was picked (only half a year, many one-off new players) makes it look like 5% failu
by pyrale 10y ago
Sounds like a PR article written just in time to rescue spaceX. The way data was picked (only half a year, many one-off new players) makes it look like 5% failure rate across the industry is the norm :
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Ariane_launches https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Ariane_launches
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Atlas_launches_%282010%E2%80%9319%29 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Atlas_launches_%282010...
Some rockets can claim years or decades of service without losing a single satellite.
- api 10y agoSure. I do have to point out though that those systems are not innovative. I personally expect SpaceX to have more failures and am not surprised that they have. Back when NASA and the USSR were innovating in the 50s they both blew up a lot of stuff.