Your argument assumes it's not within their power to end this threat. In fact, the Senate proposed a bill that does just that [1]. There's nothing inherent to t

Your argument assumes it's not within their power to end this threat. In fact, the Senate proposed a bill that does just that [1]. There's nothing inherent to the current architecture that prevents the government from compelling companies to do their bidding. We've seen that time and time again with NSA surveillance. The crux of this article is that the Internet was largely funded by the public, then handed over to an oligopoly of telecoms in the 1990's. There's nothing about this arrangement that protects average users. In fact, it is partially responsible for the U.S. having the slowest average broadband speeds of any industrialized nation [2]. [1] http://www.dailydot.com/layer8/encryption-backdoors-legislation-richard-burr-diane-feinstein/ http://www.dailydot.com/layer8/encryption-backdoors-legislat... [2] http://gizmodo.com/why-americas-internet-is-so-shitty-and-slow-1686173744 http://gizmodo.com/why-americas-internet-is-so-shitty-and-sl...