4 ms·
This is a very 'computer programmer' mindset. Most people want an appealing UI out of the box, less need to configure at the expense of configurability.
by bananaoomarang 10y ago
This is a very 'computer programmer' mindset. Most people want an appealing UI out of the box, less need to configure at the expense of configurability.
- ashark 10y agoI'd bet a fair percentage of computer users are uncomfortable resizing windows and rarely/never resize. And a smaller but still significant set is probably unaware that it's possible or how to do it.
- cmurf 10y agoIsn't the browser experience on Chrome OS pretty much full screen?
- hnal943 10y agoIt is a windowed environment, same as any other.
- cmurf 10y agoSure, but in practice I think the idea is you run the browser full screen most of the time.
- PhasmaFelis 10y agoHuh? Chrome's fullscreen functionality is the same as any other browser's. And fullscreen hides tabs, so it's definitely not something you want to do most of the time.
- KirinDave 10y agoNo, it's by default a single window experience. You can get it to do standard, classical, utterly terrible overlapping windows. But it's not the default experience. Not that it matters, really. Narrowing the field is just good practice for readability.
- CamperBob2 10y agoThose people should be using tablets, not computers. Edit: if you disagree, what the heck are you doing on a site called "Hacker News?" Comment, don't just vote.
- euyyn 10y agoBecause you asked for reasons: The context of this conversation is how a product should have been done. The devs that make that product want people to use it. You're suggesting that they ignore part of that user base, based on a claim that people shouldn't browse the internet however is most convenient for them. E.g. by using a computer they already have instead of a tablet they might not. All parts of that reasoning are ridiculous.