5 ms·
>already terrible Don't quite see how Chinese is so terrible. It's a remarkably efficient mode of writing for a language filled with monosyllabic words and homo
by jaykru 10y ago
>already terrible
Don't quite see how Chinese is so terrible. It's a remarkably efficient mode of writing for a language filled with monosyllabic words and homophones.
Japanese's appropriation of hanzi is largely a historical accident due to geographical circumstance, but most learned in the language most would agree it's far more efficient than simply using hiragana or katakana or even romaji; disambiguation by pictographs (though in modern times they are more accurately phono-semantic compounds) is of great value in written language where space is at a premium.
- thaumasiotes 10y ago> Don't quite see how Chinese is so terrible. It's a remarkably efficient mode of writing for a language filled with monosyllabic words and homophones. It is the opposite. A writing system that requires multiple years to learn is not "efficient".
- imtringued 10y agoIt's more efficient if you have a lot of words with the same pronounciation.
- thaumasiotes 10y agoIn what way?