4 ms·
Sadly haven't, because I have not had a reason to need it. Working with Clojure mostly. I like how Typed Racket "carries" the types with it when code from it is
by hkjgkjy 10y ago
Sadly haven't, because I have not had a reason to need it. Working with Clojure mostly. I like how Typed Racket "carries" the types with it when code from it is imported into other languages (like untyped Racket) via contracts.
Lisps are definitely the most readable language - and with something like Smartparens or Paredit, combined with Rainbow-delimiters in Emacs it's the best programming I know by very very far.
What is your experience of Typed Racket?