3 ms·
The writeup seems a bit goofy and I can't find the paper with the doi. Anyone else having any luck finding the actual paper?
by thisisnotmyname 17y ago
The writeup seems a bit goofy and I can't find the paper with the doi. Anyone else having any luck finding the actual paper?
- deleted 17y ago[deleted]
- borga 17y agoIt seems that this is the one: http://www.pnas.org/content/early/2010/03/11/0910200107.abstract?sid=3fe4cc22-9d94-48b9-b5d6-12b0fb09652d http://www.pnas.org/content/early/2010/03/11/0910200107.abst... 10.1073/pnas.0910200107 but I'm not completely sure.
- Estragon 17y agoThe paper you link to actually seems more interesting to me than the one described in the OP. Definitely a different paper, though, unless the OP author was on crack.
- thisisnotmyname 17y agoYeah, that's a different one, but you're right, it is way more interesting. What they've found is that the interactions of groups of proteins is very highly conserved, so proteins that work together towards a function in plants are still working together in humans, for example, even after millions of years of evolution. They use this to find a plant model for a neurological development disorder.
- deleted 17y ago[deleted]
- CoryOndrejka 17y agoNot the right DOI, but this article from last year covers the same territory: http://www.pnas.org/content/106/30/12323.full http://www.pnas.org/content/106/30/12323.full The article from the current issue that best matches the discussion in the ARS article is here: http://www.pnas.org/content/107/9/4051.abstract?sid=dfaf11ad-e71a-4973-8636-774a744c717e http://www.pnas.org/content/107/9/4051.abstract?sid=dfaf11ad... Can't find the article cited at the DOI link is broken.