That is exactly what Google does: display too many results for a human to sort through effectively, and that is why ddg flattens google. Wikipedia is humans di

That is exactly what Google does: display too many results for a human to sort through effectively, and that is why ddg flattens google. Wikipedia is humans disambiguating words; ddg is an abstraction of Wikipedia. This ddg setup is the power of humans disambiguating words into a tree structure, and the power of machines indexing and querying this tree structure on behalf of humans. I believe wikipedia would do well in copying ddg interface. Generally, finding information in well structured trees is faster than one modge podge long list - hence the perceived better results. tree power mate, tree power.