It's right there: > The next argument is something of a conspiracy theory born in part out of the opaque nature of the country’s finances. It posits that close

It's right there: > The next argument is something of a conspiracy theory born in part out of the opaque nature of the country’s finances. It posits that close associates of the administration are major holders of the country’s bonds and that the government fears it’d lose their much-needed support if the payments stopped coming in. Efforts to obtain comment from government press officials on this and other aspects of the story were unsuccessful.