You think that sharing pictures of people under 18, who have given the implicit notion that these are private pictures, is ok? Because please dear god tell me

You think that sharing pictures of people under 18, who have given the implicit notion that these are private pictures, is ok? Because please dear god tell me that you're talking about the peeing in the street or something, and that was just a poor quote placement? There's a difference between going to a nude beach, where you have an expectation of nudity vs. being in the street and taking out your penis. If you're doing this repeatedly, then you have been repeatedly exposing your genitals to people who have not consented to the exposure. There's a gigantic difference. Nudity and being happy with your body and happy with the body of others is fine. The thing about nude beaches is that they are not sexual. People are not creepy at nude beaches. I'm asking you to engage in a thought experiment. I'm wondering where the line for child porn begins and ends for you -- because its complicated is just not a fine argument when it comes to legal systems. I think that judges should use discretion when it comes down to cases like the one you're talking about, but they only have to use discretion because it is still child pornography by definition.