5 ms·
Tesla's statement[1] provides some more details > What we know is that the vehicle was on a divided highway with Autopilot engaged when a tractor trailer drove
by netinstructions 10y ago
Tesla's statement[1] provides some more details
> What we know is that the vehicle was on a divided highway with Autopilot engaged when a tractor trailer drove across the highway perpendicular to the Model S. Neither Autopilot nor the driver noticed the white side of the tractor trailer against a brightly lit sky, so the brake was not applied.
Failing to detect the white side of a tractor against a brightly lit sky is something I can see camera/image based sensors struggling with, but not LIDAR based sensors.
[1] https://www.teslamotors.com/blog/tragic-loss https://www.teslamotors.com/blog/tragic-loss
- at-fates-hands 10y agoThis is going to be a major morality issue with self driving cars. What if a deer crosses the road? Will the car hit the deer to save the life of the driver? Avoid the deer to avoid an accident? Or save the deer and run into the ditch, possibly harming the driver? Unfortunately, this technology is not capable of making those decisions and if ultimately the driver is responsible, then maybe we should just keep it that way then.
- techthroway443 10y agoRapidly apply brakes. Seems like the safest possible way to avoid the deer without causing injury to driver + possibly others.
- massysett 10y ago"Or save the deer and run into the ditch, possibly harming the driver?" This is not even a slight morality issue. The person is more important than the deer. "Unfortunately, this technology is not capable of making those decisions" Of course it is. Program the machine so that its primary concern is protection of human life. Which should be its secondary concern (protection of property or protection of deer) is a more interesting question. But running into the ditch to save the deer while threatening harm to the driver is simply not an option.
- arprocter 10y agoReplace 'deer' with 'child' and there's suddenly more of a quandary
- gshulegaard 10y agoThere was some discussion, but Tesla has a forward facing radar, but it is mounted lower than the camera and trailers of certain height have been shown to avoid it's detection window. So, speculatively, it is a double failure: 1) Trailer was high enough to avoid radar 2) Trailer was light enough/low contrast to avoid detection by the camera
- sangnoir 10y agoUpside of working on "boring CRUD apps that won't change the world": your edge-cases won't result in fatalities. I hope Tesla learns something from this, from the outside looking in - they appear to have a cavalier, can-do attitude (nothing wrong with the latter) towards safety engineering. Release beta self-driving software to production vehicles? Yeah, why not?
- joezydeco 10y agoHow does Tesla know the driver didn't see the trailer? He was killed in the crash. Is there a cockpit voice recorder?
- luciusism 10y agoPresumably because the brakes weren't engaged.
- sangnoir 10y agoIt is possible he was expecting the Model S to auto-brake as it normally does, and possibly realized when it was too late and panicked/tried to swerve. But I'm just speculating, I'm waiting to hear the outcome of the NHTSA investigation.
- incompatible 10y agoI'd have thought the auto-brake would be expected to react faster than a human driver in that situation. So if you saw such an event and the car wasn't already braking you'd hit the brakes, not sit around waiting to find out if it handled it or not.
- growt 10y agoI think the problem might have been that the middle of the trailer is not at ground level but at some hight where the lidar data is ignored or not there.