3 ms·
It seems particularly egregious that non-competes apply even in the case of layoffs or firing. It's one thing to keep employees from running off to a competito
by morgante 10y ago
It seems particularly egregious that non-competes apply even in the case of layoffs or firing.
It's one thing to keep employees from running off to a competitor for a slightly higher salary.
It's unconscionable to fire someone and then prevent them from finding a new job in their field. That's egregious.
- harry8 10y agoYou can fire someone to go to their competitor for a lower salary, eg off-shoring. That's just fine. Surely it has to work both ways. You must be able to quit to go to a higher salary unencumbered or it's just pure regulatory capture by employers to screw employees.
- st3v3r 10y agoYou're under the impression that employers want things to be fair.